Hydrogen Production from Steam Reforming ofm-Cresol, a Model Compound Derived from Bio-oil: Green Process Evaluation Based on Liquid Condensate Recycling

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 5139-5147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ceng Wu ◽  
Ronghou Liu
2013 ◽  
Vol 724-725 ◽  
pp. 769-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Fu ◽  
Wei Ming Yi ◽  
Zhi He Li ◽  
Xue Yuan Bai

The reaction thermodynamics of sorption enhanced steam reforming (SESR) of acetic acid as a model compound of bio-oil for hydrogen production were investigated and contrasted with acetic acid steam reforming (SR). The most favorable temperature for SR is approximately 650 °C. However, the optimum temperature for SESR is around 550 °C, which is about 100 °C lower than that for SR. The highest hydrogen concentration from SR is only 67%, which is below the basic requirement of hydrogen purity for fuel cells. In SESR, hydrogen purities are over 99% in 500-550 °C with a calcium oxide to acetic acid molar ratio (CAMR) of 4 and a water to acetic acid molar ratio (WAMR) greater than 6. The results show that hydrogen production from sorption enhanced steam reforming of acetic acid should be a promising direction.


2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 2399-2406 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Carmen Ramos ◽  
Ana I. Navascués ◽  
Lucía García ◽  
Rafael Bilbao

2012 ◽  
Vol 534 ◽  
pp. 141-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Guo ◽  
Xin Bao Li ◽  
Qi Wang ◽  
Shu Rong Wang

In our work, acetic acid was used as a bio-oil model compound. Thermodynamic calculation of hydrogen production via steam reforming of acetic acid was attempted to investigate the effects of temperature (200-1100 °C), pressure(1-19 atm )and steam to carbon ratio (1.5-10.5) on the concentration of equilibrium product gas and H2 yield. The results show that temperature has a profound effect on the steam reforming of acetic acid. Lower pressure and higher steam to carbon ratio are in favor of higher hydrogen production.


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (42) ◽  
pp. 14445-14455 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. García-García ◽  
E. Acha ◽  
K. Bizkarra ◽  
J. Martínez de Ilarduya ◽  
J. Requies ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-ping Xue ◽  
Chang-feng Yan ◽  
Xiao-yong Zhao ◽  
Shi-lin Huang ◽  
Chang-qing Guo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document