Viscosity Model for Oxide Melts Relevant to Coal Ash Slags Based on the Associate Species Thermodynamic Model

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 6469-6476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Nentwig ◽  
Alexander Kondratiev ◽  
Elena Yazhenskikh ◽  
Klaus Hack ◽  
Michael Müller
2015 ◽  
Vol 138 ◽  
pp. 520-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guixuan Wu ◽  
Elena Yazhenskikh ◽  
Klaus Hack ◽  
Michael Müller
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Guixuan Wu ◽  
Sören Seebold ◽  
Elena Zayhenskikh ◽  
Klaus Hack ◽  
Michael Müller

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 93-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guixuan Wu ◽  
Elena Yazhenskikh ◽  
Klaus Hack ◽  
Erwin Wosch ◽  
Michael Müller

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 698-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guo-Hua Zhang ◽  
Kuo-Chih Chou ◽  
Ken Mills
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Barker ◽  
B. Casaday ◽  
P. Shankara ◽  
A. Ameri ◽  
J. P. Bons

Coal ash deposition was numerically modeled on a GE-E3 high pressure turbine vane passage. A model was developed, in conjunction with FLUENT™ software, to track individual particles through the turbine passage. Two sticking models were used to predict the rates of deposition which were subsequently compared to experimental trends. The strengths and limitations of the two sticking models, the critical viscosity model and the critical velocity model, are discussed. The former model ties deposition exclusively to particle temperature while the latter considers both the particle temperature and velocity. Both incorporate some level of empiricism, though the critical viscosity model has the potential to be more readily adaptable to different ash compositions. Experimental results show that both numerical models are reasonably accurate in predicting the initial stages of deposition. Beyond the initial stage of deposition, for which transient effects must be accounted.


Author(s):  
B. Barker ◽  
B. Casaday ◽  
P. Shankara ◽  
A. Ameri ◽  
J. P. Bons

Coal ash deposition was numerically modeled on a GE-E3 high pressure turbine vane passage. A model was developed, in conjunction with Fluent™ software, to track individual particles through the turbine passage. Two sticking models were used to predict the rates of deposition which were subsequently compared to experimental trends. The strengths and limitations of the two sticking models, the critical viscosity model and the critical velocity model, are discussed. The former model ties deposition exclusively to particle temperature while the latter considers both the particle temperature and velocity. Both incorporate some level of empiricism, though the critical viscosity model has the potential to be more readily adaptable to different ash compositions. Experimental results show that both numerical models are reasonably accurate in predicting the initial stages of deposition. Beyond the initial stage of deposition, transient effects must be accounted for.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf Zitny ◽  
Jiří Sestak ◽  
Alexander Tsiapouris ◽  
Lothar Linke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document