Veränderungsmechanismen in Elterntrainings am Beispiel von Workplace Triple P

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doreen Hartung ◽  
Franziska Lups ◽  
Kurt Hahlweg
Keyword(s):  
Triple P

Elterntrainings haben sich als eine geeignete Interventionsform erwiesen, um dysfunktionales Erziehungsverhalten zu reduzieren und elterliche Selbstwirksamkeit zu steigern. Wie diese Veränderungen erzielt werden ist jedoch größtenteils unerforscht. Am Beispiel von Workplace Triple P wurde überprüft, ob Veränderungen in der elterlichen Selbstwirksamkeit zu Veränderungen im Erziehungsverhalten führen oder ob Veränderungen im Erziehungsverhalten zu Veränderungen in der elterlichen Selbstwirksamkeit führen. Als Stichprobe dienten berufstätige Eltern einer Experimental- und Wartelistenkontrollgruppe (N = 97 Eltern; 74 Mütter, 23 Väter; n [EG] = 42; n [KG] = 55). Regressionsbasierte Mediatoranalysen belegen, dass die Effekte des Trainings auf die elterliche Selbstwirksamkeit durch die Reduktion des dysfunktionalen Erziehungsverhaltens mediiert werden. Umgekehrt konnte jedoch nicht gezeigt werden, dass die Effekte des Trainings auf das dysfunktionale Erziehungsverhalten der Eltern durch Verbesserungen der elterlichen Selbstwirksamkeit mediiert werden. Diese Ergebnisse unterstützen die Bedeutung von Elterntrainings, in denen konkrete Erziehungs- und Stressmanagementfertigkeiten geübt und im Alltag umgesetzt werden, um positive Veränderungen im Familienleben zu erzielen.

Prävention von oppositionellen und aggressiven Verhaltensstörungen bei Kindern: Triple P Die Triple P-Materialien und Informationen zur Triple P-Ausbildung sind zu beziehen über: Verlag für Psychotherapie, PAG Institut für Psychologie, Hoyastraße 1a, 48147 Münster, Tel.: 0251/518941. - ein Programm zu einer positiven Erziehung

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annett Kuschel ◽  
Yvonne Miller ◽  
Evi Köppe ◽  
Anne Lübke ◽  
Kurt Hahlweg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Positive Parenting ◽  
Parenting Program ◽  
Triple P ◽  
Positive Parenting Program ◽  
Verhaltensstörungen Bei Kindern

Zusammenfassung. Es wird ein Überblick zum Stand der Forschung in den Bereichen Epidemiologie, Ätiologie und Behandlung von aggressivem und oppositionellem Problemverhalten bei Kindern gegeben. Triple P (Positive Parenting Program) - ein mehrstufiges präventives Programm zu positiver Erziehung - wird als ein erfolgreiches Beispiel für neue präventive Ansätze im Public Health Bereich vorgestellt. Dazu werden die theoretischen Grundlagen beschrieben, die verschiedenen Interventionsebenen und Materialien vorgestellt sowie Ergebnisse zur Effektivität berichtet. Abschließend wird über den Stand der Einführung von Triple P in Deutschland informiert.

Exploration-Stage Implementation Variation

2014 ◽  
Vol 222 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Romney ◽  
Nathaniel Israel ◽  
Danijela Zlatevski
Keyword(s):  
Parent Training ◽  
Average Cost ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Training Group ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Triple P ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Parent Training Program ◽  
A Site ◽  
The Cost

The present study examines the effect of agency-level implementation variation on the cost-effectiveness of an evidence-based parent training program (Positive Parenting Program: “Triple P”). Staff from six community-based agencies participated in a five-day training to prepare them to deliver a 12-week Triple P parent training group to caregivers. Prior to the training, administrators and staff from four of the agencies completed a site readiness process intended to prepare them for the implementation demands of successfully delivering the group, while the other two agencies did not complete the process. Following the delivery of each agency’s first Triple P group, the graduation rate and average cost per class graduate were calculated. The average cost-per-graduate was over seven times higher for the two agencies that had not completed the readiness process than for the four completing agencies ($7,811 vs. $1,052). The contrast in costs was due to high participant attrition in the Triple P groups delivered by the two agencies that did not complete the readiness process. The odds of Triple P participants graduating were 12.2 times greater for those in groups run by sites that had completed the readiness process. This differential attrition was not accounted for by between-group differences in participant characteristics at pretest. While the natural design of this study limits the ability to empirically test all alternative explanations, these findings indicate a striking cost savings for sites completing the readiness process and support the thoughtful application of readiness procedures in the early stages of an implementation initiative.

Triple P for Parents of Children with Phenylketonuria: A Nonrandomized Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy E Mitchell ◽  
Alina Morawska ◽  
Grace Kirby ◽  
James McGill ◽  
David Coman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Parenting Stress ◽  
Child Behavior ◽  
Triple P ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Nonrandomized Trial

Abstract Objective Families of children with phenylketonuria (PKU) report child emotional and behavioral problems, parenting stress, and parenting difficulties, which are associated with worse health-related quality of life. This study aimed to examine acceptability and feasibility of a brief, group-based parenting program (Healthy Living Triple P) for families of children with PKU. Methods An uncontrolled nonrandomized trial design was used. Families of children aged 2–12 years (N = 17) completed questionnaire measures assessing child behavior and impact of PKU on quality of life (primary outcomes), and parenting behavior, self-efficacy and stress, and children’s behavioral and emotional adjustment (secondary outcomes). Routinely collected blood phenylalanine (Phe) levels were obtained from the treating team. Parents selected two child behaviors as targets for change. The intervention comprised two, 2-hr group sessions delivered face-to-face or online. Assessment was repeated at 4-week postintervention (T2) and 4-month follow-up (T3). Results Attrition was low and parent satisfaction with the intervention (face-to-face and online) was high. All families achieved success with one or both child behavior goals, and 75% of families achieved 100% success with both behavior goals by T3; however, there was no change in health-related quality of life. There were moderate improvements in parent-reported ineffective parenting (total score, d = 0.87, 95% CI −1.01 to 2.75) and laxness (d = 0.59, 95% CI −1.27 to 2.46), but no effects on parenting stress or children’s adjustment. Phe levels improved by 6month post-intervention for children with elevated preintervention levels. Conclusions Results support intervention acceptability and feasibility. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to establish intervention efficacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document