Online Suicide Risk Assessment and Management Training

Crisis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Gryglewicz ◽  
Jason I. Chen ◽  
Gabriela D. Romero ◽  
Marc S. Karver ◽  
Melissa Witmeier

Abstract. Background: Many mental health professionals (MHPs) encounter youth at risk for suicide but lack knowledge and confidence to assist these individuals. Unfortunately, training for MHPs on suicide risk assessment and management is often not adequately accessible. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether MHPs' knowledge, attitudes, perceived social norms, and perceived behavioral control in working with at-risk suicidal youth improve following an online training (QPRT: Question, Persuade, Refer, Treat). Method: QPRT was provided to 225 MHPs from three large urban areas in the United States. Suicide prevention literacy, attitudes, perceived social norms, and perceived behavioral control in assessing and managing suicide risk were assessed before and after training. Data were also collected on training engagement and completion. Results: Suicide prevention literacy in most competency domains and perceived behavioral control increased significantly after participation in QPRT. Suicide prevention attitudes and some knowledge domains did not significantly improve. MHPs reported high satisfaction with the training. Conclusion: The current study provides initial support for offering MHPs online suicide risk assessment and management training. Online training programs may be an engaging and feasible means for providing advanced suicide prevention skills to MHPs who may have numerous barriers to accessing face-to-face training.

Crisis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie A. Hom ◽  
Matthew C. Podlogar ◽  
Ian H. Stanley ◽  
Thomas E. Joiner

Abstract. Background: Research with human subjects represents a critical avenue for suicide prevention efforts; however, such research is not without its ethical and practical challenges. Specifically, given the nature of research with individuals at elevated risk for suicide (e.g., increased concerns regarding participant safety, adverse events, liability, difficulties often arise during the institutional review board (IRB) evaluation and approval process. Aims: This paper aims to discuss IRB-related issues associated with suicide prevention research, including researcher and IRB panel member responsibilities, suicide risk assessment and management ethics and procedures, informed consent considerations, preparation of study protocols, and education and training. Points to consider and components to potentially include in an IRB application for suicide-related research are additionally provided. Method: Literature relevant to ethics in suicide research and suicide risk assessment and management was reviewed and synthesized. Results: Suicide research can be conducted in accordance with ethical principles while also furthering the science of suicide prevention. Conclusion: Despite the challenging nature of suicide prevention research, empirically informed solutions exist to address difficulties that may emerge in interfacing with IRBs. There remain areas for improvement in the IRB approval process that warrant further investigation and work.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sruthi Chunduri ◽  
Sabrina Browne ◽  
David E. Pollio ◽  
Barry A. Hong ◽  
Writtika Roy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document