Doubts About the Role of Rehearsal in the Irrelevant Sound Effect

Author(s):  
Jamielyn R. Samper ◽  
Alexandra Morrison ◽  
Jason Chein

Abstract. The irrelevant sound effect (ISE) describes the disruption of processes involved in maintaining information in working memory (WM) when irrelevant noise is present in the environment. While some posit that the ISE arises due to split obligation of attention to the irrelevant sound and the to-be-remembered information, others have argued that background noise corrupts the order of information within WM. Support for the latter position comes from research showing that the ISE appears to be most robust in tasks that emphasize ordered maintenance by a serial rehearsal strategy, and diminished when rehearsal is discouraged or precluded by task characteristics. This prior work confounds the demand for seriation with rehearsal. Thus, the present study aims to disentangle ordered maintenance from a rehearsal strategy by using a running memory span task that requires ordered output but obviates the utility of rehearsal. Across four experiments, we find a significant ISE that persists under conditions that should discourage the use of rehearsal and among individuals who self-report use of alternative strategies. These findings indicate that rehearsal is not necessary to produce an ISE in a serial recall task and thus fail to corroborate accounts of the ISE that emphasize the involvement of rehearsal.

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 2152-2161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh Dorsi ◽  
Navin Viswanathan ◽  
Lawrence D Rosenblum ◽  
James W Dias

The Irrelevant Sound Effect (ISE) is the finding that background sound impairs accuracy for visually presented serial recall tasks. Among various auditory backgrounds, speech typically acts as the strongest distractor. Based on the changing-state hypothesis, speech is a disruptive background because it is more complex than other nonspeech backgrounds. In the current study, we evaluate an alternative explanation by examining whether the speech-likeness of the background (speech fidelity) contributes, beyond signal complexity, to the ISE. We did this by using noise-vocoded speech as a background. In Experiment 1, we varied the complexity of the background by manipulating the number of vocoding channels. Results indicate that the ISE increases with the number of channels, suggesting that more complex signals produce greater ISEs. In Experiment 2, we varied complexity and speech fidelity independently. At each channel level, we selectively reversed a subset of channels to design a low-fidelity signal that was equated in overall complexity. Experiment 2 results indicated that speech-like noise-vocoded speech produces a larger ISE than selectively reversed noise-vocoded speech. Finally, in Experiment 3, we evaluated the locus of the speech-fidelity effect by assessing the distraction produced by these stimuli in a missing-item task. In this task, even though noise-vocoded speech disrupted task performance relative to silence, neither its complexity nor speech fidelity contributed to this effect. Together, these findings indicate a clear role for speech fidelity of the background beyond its changing-state quality and its attention capture potential.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M. Elliott ◽  
Kenneth Barideaux ◽  
Alicia M. Briganti

Author(s):  
Simon P. Banbury ◽  
Dylan M. Jones ◽  
Lucy Emery

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 306-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-France Pelletier ◽  
Helen M. Hodgetts ◽  
Martin F. Lafleur ◽  
Annick Vincent ◽  
Sébastien Tremblay

2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 3161-3161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine J. Schlittmeier ◽  
Tobias Weissgerber ◽  
Stefan Kerber ◽  
Hugo Fastl ◽  
Juergen Hellbrueck

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1168-1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Klatte ◽  
Thomas Lachmann ◽  
Sabine Schlittmeier ◽  
Jürgen Hellbrück

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document