scholarly journals Monitoring eruptive activity at Mount St. Helens with TIR image data

2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (19) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Vaughan ◽  
S. J. Hook ◽  
M. S. Ramsey ◽  
V. J. Realmuto ◽  
D. J. Schneider
Geology ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 523 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Gardner ◽  
Steve Carey ◽  
Haraldur Sigurdsson ◽  
Malcolm J. Rutherford

Fractals ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (03) ◽  
pp. 179-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
FILIPPO CARUSO ◽  
SERGIO VINCIGUERRA ◽  
VITO LATORA ◽  
ANDREA RAPISARDA ◽  
STEPHEN MALONE

We present a multifractal analysis of Mount St. Helens seismic activity during 1980–2002. The seismic time distribution is studied in relation to the eruptive activity, mainly marked by the 1980 major explosive eruptions and by the 1980–1986 dome building eruptions. The spectrum of the generalized fractal dimensions, i.e. Dq versus q, extracted from the data, allows us to identify two main earthquake time distribution patterns. The first one exhibits a multifractal clustering correlated to the intense seismic swarms of the dome building activity. The second one is characterized by an almost constant value of Dq ≈ 1, as for a random uniform distribution. The time evolution of Dq (for q = 0.2), calculated on a fixed number of events window and at different depths, shows that the brittle mechanical response of the shallow layers to rapid magma intrusions, during the eruptive periods, is revealed by sharp changes, acting at a short time scale (order of days), and by the lowest values of Dq (≈ 0.3). Conversely, for deeper earthquakes, characterized by intense seismic swarms, Dq do not show obvious changes during the whole analyzed period, suggesting that the earthquakes, related to the deep magma supply system, are characterized by a minor degree of clustering, which is independent of the eruptive activity.


1985 ◽  
Vol 3 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 397-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.A. Swanson ◽  
T.J. Casadevall ◽  
D. Dzurisin ◽  
R.T. Holcomb ◽  
C.G. Newhall ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Robert M. Glaeser ◽  
Bing K. Jap

The dynamical scattering effect, which can be described as the failure of the first Born approximation, is perhaps the most important factor that has prevented the widespread use of electron diffraction intensities for crystallographic structure determination. It would seem to be quite certain that dynamical effects will also interfere with structure analysis based upon electron microscope image data, whenever the dynamical effect seriously perturbs the diffracted wave. While it is normally taken for granted that the dynamical effect must be taken into consideration in materials science applications of electron microscopy, very little attention has been given to this problem in the biological sciences.


Author(s):  
Richard S. Chemock

One of the most common tasks in a typical analysis lab is the recording of images. Many analytical techniques (TEM, SEM, and metallography for example) produce images as their primary output. Until recently, the most common method of recording images was by using film. Current PS/2R systems offer very large capacity data storage devices and high resolution displays, making it practical to work with analytical images on PS/2s, thereby sidestepping the traditional film and darkroom steps. This change in operational mode offers many benefits: cost savings, throughput, archiving and searching capabilities as well as direct incorporation of the image data into reports.The conventional way to record images involves film, either sheet film (with its associated wet chemistry) for TEM or PolaroidR film for SEM and light microscopy. Although film is inconvenient, it does have the highest quality of all available image recording techniques. The fine grained film used for TEM has a resolution that would exceed a 4096x4096x16 bit digital image.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document