scholarly journals Localized analysis of satellite tracking data for studying time-variable Earth's gravity fields

Author(s):  
Shin-Chan Han ◽  
David D. Rowlands ◽  
Scott B. Luthcke ◽  
Frank G. Lemoine
2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (13) ◽  
pp. 1331-1340 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Goossens ◽  
P.N.A.M. Visser ◽  
B.A.C. Ambrosius

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 3075
Author(s):  
Ming Xu ◽  
Xiaoyun Wan ◽  
Runjing Chen ◽  
Yunlong Wu ◽  
Wenbing Wang

This study compares the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE)/GRACE Follow-On (GFO) errors with the coseismic gravity variations generated by earthquakes above Mw8.0s that occurred during April 2002~June 2017 and evaluates the influence of monthly model errors on the coseismic signal detection. The results show that the precision of GFO monthly models is approximately 38% higher than that of the GRACE monthly model and all the detected earthquakes have signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) larger than 1.8. The study concludes that the precision of the time-variable gravity fields should be improved by at least one order in order to detect all the coseismic gravity signals of earthquakes with M ≥ 8.0. By comparing the spectral intensity distribution of the GFO stack errors and the 2019 Mw8.0 Peru earthquake, it is found that the precision of the current GFO monthly model meets the requirement to detect the coseismic signal of the earthquake. However, due to the limited time length of the observations and the interference of the hydrological signal, the coseismic signals are, in practice, difficult to extract currently.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 562-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Sergio ◽  
Alessandro Tanferna ◽  
Julio Blas ◽  
Guillermo Blanco ◽  
Fernando Hiraldo

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Meyer ◽  
Martin Lasser ◽  
Adrian Jäggi ◽  
Christoph Dahle ◽  
Frank Flechtner ◽  
...  

<p>The Combination Service for Time-variable Gravity Fields (COST-G) of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) provides combined monthly gravity fields of its associated and partner Analysis Centers (ACs). In November 2020, the combination of monthly GRACE-FO gravity fields started its operational mode, providing consolidated L2 (spherical harmonics) and L3 (gridded and post- processed) products with a latency of currently 3 months. We present an overview and quality assessment of the available products.</p><p>COST-G aims at the extension of its service to include further GRACE and GRACE-FO analysis centers. In January 2020 a collaboration with representatives of five Chinese ACs was initiated, who provided GRACE time-series according to the COST-G requirements. We present the results of a test combination with the Chinese AC models, including comparison and quality assessment of all contributing time-series and validation of the combined gravity fields.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Meyer ◽  
Martin Lasser ◽  
Adrian Jäggi ◽  
Frank Flechtner ◽  
Christoph Dahle ◽  
...  

<p lang="en-US">We present the operational GRACE-FO combined time-series of monthly gravity fields of the Combination Service for Time-variable Gravity fields (COST-G) of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG). COST-G_GRACE-FO_RL01_operational is combined at AIUB and relies on operational monthly solutions of the COST-G Analysis Centers GFZ, GRGS, IfG, LUH and AIUB and the associated Analysis Centers CSR and JPL. All COST-G Analysis Centers have passed a benchmark test to ensure consistency between the different processing approaches and all of the contributing time-series undergo a strict quality control focusing on the signal content in river basins and polar regions with pronounced changes in ice mass to uncover any regularization that may bias the combination.</p> <p lang="en-US">The combination is performed by variance component estimation on the solution level, the relative monthly weights thus providing valuable and independent insight into the consistency and noise levels of the individual monthly contributions. The combined products then are validated internally in terms of noise, approximated by the non-secular, non-seasonal variability over the oceans. Once they have passed this quality control the combined gravity fields are assessed by an external board of experts who evaluate them in terms of orbit predictions, lake altimetry, river hydrology or oceanography.</p>


2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 651-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu-Hua ZHOU ◽  
Houtse HSU ◽  
Bin WU ◽  
Bi-Bo PENG ◽  
Yang LU

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document