New fault slip distribution for the 2010 M w 7.2 El Mayor Cucapah earthquake based on realistic 3D finite element inversions of coseismic displacements using space geodetic data.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Pulvirenti ◽  
Zhen Liu ◽  
Paul Lundgren ◽  
Alejandro Gonzalez‐Ortega ◽  
Marco Aloisi
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Fault Slip ◽  
Geodetic Data ◽  
Slip Distribution ◽  
3D Finite Element ◽  
Fault Slip Distribution

FAULT SLIP DISTRIBUTION ALONG THE SOUTHERN 15 KM OF THE M7.1 RIDGECREST EARTHQUAKE SURFACE RUPTURE

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinan O. Akciz ◽  
◽  
Salena Padilla ◽  
James F. Dolan ◽  
Alex E. Hatem
Keyword(s):  
Fault Slip ◽  
Slip Distribution ◽  
Surface Rupture ◽  
Fault Slip Distribution

scholarly journals Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Gao ◽  
HuRong Duan ◽  
YongZhi Zhang ◽  
JiaYing Chen ◽  
HeTing Jian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strike Slip ◽  
Fault Slip ◽  
Slip Distribution ◽  
Synthetic Aperture ◽  
Seismic Events ◽  
Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar ◽  
The Past ◽  
Dextral Strike Slip Fault ◽  
Fault Slip Distribution ◽  
Dextral Strike Slip

AbstractThe 2019 Ridgecrest, California seismic sequence, including an Mw6.4 foreshock and Mw7.1 mainshock, represent the largest regional seismic events within the past 20 years. To obtain accurate coseismic fault-slip distribution, we used precise positioning data of small earthquakes from January 2019 to October 2020 to determine the dip parameters of the eight fault geometry, and used the Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data processed by Xu et al. (Seismol Res Lett 91(4):1979–1985, 2020) at UCSD to constrain inversion of the fault-slip distribution of both earthquakes. The results showed that all faults were sinistral strike-slips with minor dip-slip components, exception for dextral strike-slip fault F2. Fault-slip mainly occurred at depths of 0–12 km, with a maximum slip of 3.0 m. The F1 fault contained two slip peaks located at 2 km of fault S4 and 6 km of fault S5 depth, the latter being located directly above the Mw7.1hypocenter. Two slip peaks with maximum slip of 1.5 m located 8 and 20 km from the SW endpoint of the F2 fault were also identified, and the latter corresponds to the Mw6.4 earthquake. We also analyzed the influence of different inversion parameters on the fault slip distribution, and found that the slip momentum smoothing condition was more suitable for the inversion of the earthquakes slip distribution than the stress-drop smoothing condition.

scholarly journals Fault slip distribution and fault roughness

2011 ◽  
Vol 187 (2) ◽  
pp. 959-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thibault Candela ◽  
François Renard ◽  
Jean Schmittbuhl ◽  
Michel Bouchon ◽  
Emily E. Brodsky
Keyword(s):  
Fault Slip ◽  
Slip Distribution ◽  
Fault Roughness ◽  
Fault Slip Distribution

scholarly journals Fault slip distribution of the 2014 Iquique, Chile, earthquake estimated from ocean-wide tsunami waveforms and GPS data

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 1053-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Riadi Gusman ◽  
Satoko Murotani ◽  
Kenji Satake ◽  
Mohammad Heidarzadeh ◽  
Endra Gunawan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fault Slip ◽  
Slip Distribution ◽  
Gps Data ◽  
Chile Earthquake ◽  
Tsunami Waveforms ◽  
Fault Slip Distribution

scholarly journals Author Correction: Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Gao ◽  
HuRong Duan ◽  
YongZhi Zhang ◽  
JiaYing Chen ◽  
HeTing Jian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fault Slip ◽  
Slip Distribution ◽  
Fault Slip Distribution
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document