Developing a Code of Fair Testing Practices in Education.

1989 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 1062-1067 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Fremer ◽  
Esther E. Diamond ◽  
Wayne J. Camara
Keyword(s):  
1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Muñiz ◽  
Gerardo Prieto ◽  
Leandro Almeida ◽  
Dave Bartram

Summary: The two main sources of errors in educational and psychological evaluation are the lack of adequate technical and psychometric characteristics of the tests, and especially the failure to properly implement the testing process. The main goal of the present research is to study the situation of test construction and test use in the Spanish-speaking (Spain and Latin American countries) and Portuguese-speaking (Portugal and Brazil) countries. The data were collected using a questionnaire constructed by the European Federation of Professional Psychologists Association (EFPPA) Task Force on Tests and Testing, under the direction of D. Bartram . In addition to the questionnaire, other ad hoc data were also gathered. Four main areas of psychological testing were investigated: Educational, Clinical, Forensic and Work. Key persons were identified in each country in order to provide reliable information. The main results are presented, and some measures that could be taken in order to improve the current testing practices in the countries surveyed are discussed. As most of the tests used in these countries were originally developed in other cultures, a problem that appears to be especially relevant is the translation and adaptation of tests.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyungju Lee ◽  
Ja-Hyun Jang ◽  
Seung-Tae Lee ◽  
Kyong-Ah Yoon ◽  
Eun Sook Lee ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 618-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Traci A. Takahashi ◽  
Kay M. Johnson ◽  
Katharine A. Bradley

Author(s):  
Laurent Pasquier ◽  
Guy Minguet ◽  
Sylvie Moisdon-Chataigner ◽  
Pascal Jarno ◽  
Philippe Denizeau ◽  
...  

AbstractGenetic testing is accepted to be a common practice in many medical specialties. These genetic tests raise issues such as respect for basic rights, how to handle results and uncertainty and how to balance concerns for medical confidentiality with the rights of third parties. Physicians need help to deal with the rapid development of genomic medicine as most of them have received no specific training on the medical, ethical, and social issues involved. Analyzing how these professionals integrate genetic testing into the patient-provider relationship is essential to paving the way for a better use of genomics by all. We conducted a qualitative study comprising a series of focus groups with 21 neurologists and endocrinologists about their genetic testing practices in the western part of France. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed for major themes. We identified an automated care management procedure of genetic testing that affects patient autonomy. The simple fact of having a written consent cannot justify a genetic test given the stakes associated with the results. We also suggest orienting practices toward a systemic approach using a multidisciplinary team or network to provide resources for dealing with uncertainties in interpreting results or situations that require additional technical or clinical skills and, if necessary, to allow for joint consultations with both a geneticist and a non-geneticist medical specialist.


2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. S64 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Wiskel ◽  
E.A. Samuels ◽  
M. Habet ◽  
J.M. Mackey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document