A signal detection analysis of hypnotically induced narrowing of the peripheral visual field.

1976 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 446-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Miller ◽  
H. W. Leibowitz
1981 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Salmon ◽  
Albert Rodwan

A signal-detection analysis was used to evaluate visual-field sensitivity on a two-choice (same/different) discrimination task. Pairs of unfamiliar geometrical forms were presented tachistoscopically to the right or left visual fields of 12 subjects. Of 12 subjects 11 obtained left visual-field values which exceeded those of the right. The data suggested that the superiority of stimulation of the left visual field resulted from greater sensitivity to “same” figure pairs.


1994 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. R. Nicholls

Divided visual field techniques were used to investigate hemispheric asymmetries for (a) the threshold of fusion of two flashes of light and (b) the detection of simultaneous versus successive events for a group of normal, right-handed adults. A signal detection analysis revealed a higher level of accuracy for the right visual field-left hemisphere (RVF-LH) relative to the left visual field-right hemisphere (LVF-RH) for both tasks. These results were interpreted in terms of a general left-hemisphere advantage for the discrimination of fine temporal events. The implications of these results for models of temporary asymmetry that describe the left hemisphere's advantage in terms of an exclusive specialization or relative superiority are then discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document