Q-matrix validation is of increasing concern due to the significance and subjective tendency of Q-matrix construction in the modeling process. This research proposes a residual-based approach to empirically validate Q-matrix specification based on a combination of fit measures. The approach separates Q-matrix validation into four logical steps, including the test-level evaluation, possible distinction between attribute-level and item-level misspecifications, identification of the hit item, and fit information to aid in item adjustment. Through simulation studies and real-life examples, it is shown that the misspecified items can be detected as the hit item and adjusted sequentially when the misspecification occurs at the item level or at random. Adjustment can be based on the maximum reduction of the test-level measures. When adjustment of individual items tends to be useless, attribute-level misspecification is of concern. The approach can accommodate a variety of cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) and be extended to cover other response formats.
A Residual-Based Approach to Validate Q-Matrix Specifications
