Stimulus control in instrumental discrimination learning and reinforcement schedule situations.

1984 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. D. Capaldi ◽  
Timothy M. Nawrocki ◽  
Donna R. Verry
2010 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Miskovsky ◽  
Brittney Becker ◽  
Alleah Hilker ◽  
Charles I. Abramson

The fish stick is an easy-to-use device for conditioning fish under classroom conditions. It is constructed from inexpensive plastic pipe available at most hardware stores and uses electronic components available at retail electronics outlets. Fish press a nipple for baby food which can be brought under stimulus control using lights, vibratory cues, or both. The fish stick is suitable for inquiry-based experiences in courses on the psychology of learning or comparative psychology. Data are presented using a continuous reinforcement schedule and discrimination learning. Students report that the fish are easy to train and enjoy the hands-on experience.


1979 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-408
Author(s):  
William R. Sewell ◽  
Rene Nickel ◽  
J. Terry Johnson ◽  
Don Williamson

2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin D. Lotfizadeh ◽  
Timothy L. Edwards ◽  
Ryan Redner ◽  
Alan Poling

1972 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 915-927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas P. Ferraro ◽  
Michael G. Grisham

Three experiments investigated stimulus control of key pecking in pigeons by varying the distance of vertices movement for a six-point complex visual shape. Ease of discrimination learning was monotonically related to the distance of vertices movement when the directions of vertices movement were held constant. As suggested by selective attention theory, steep generalization gradients were obtained following intradimensional differential training but not following nondifferential training or interdimensional differential training. These results indicate that, unlike the dimension of angular orientation or tilt, distance of vertices movement provides a consistent functional representation of complex shape similarity.


1970 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. N. WILTON ◽  
R. C. GODBOUT

1973 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 299-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H. Haude

A fading procedure similar to that reported by Terrace (1963) was used with monkeys to determine whether errorless discrimination learning could be obtained without prior establishment of a baseline of stimulus control before applying the training procedure. Four methods of training were used which differed with respect to when and how the non-reinforced stimulus (S—) was introduced. No animal learned without errors although all did acquire the discrimination. Furthermore, the fading procedure which was expected to result in errorless learning was no more effective than the other methods. These results suggest that establishing stimulus control before using a fading procedure is a necessary condition for errorless discrimination.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document