Review of Theory Testing in Organizational Behavior: The Varient Approach.

1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-161
Author(s):  
William L. Hays
1987 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. House ◽  
Fred Dansereau ◽  
Joseph A. Alutto ◽  
Francis J. Yammarino

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Emans

The comeback of the interview in organizational behavior research The comeback of the interview in organizational behavior research Organizational behavior, as a theory-developing field of research, is highly questionnaire-based and highly dependent on quantitative methods. In its dominant methodology tradition, variables are measured in a sample of respondents or other units of observation and the calculated relationships between the variables subsequently serve as the input for theory building or theory testing. This state of affairs generates restrictions regarding the domain of phenomena that can be studied. A plea is made for using of the interview as a tool for collecting data that permit theory building like questionnaire data, yet without the restrictions of these data. Quality requirements that apply to interviews used for theory building are very different from the ones that apply to questionnaires. Rather than relating to the validity and reliability of the measures, they relate to the valid elicitation of relevant facts. In short: it is a matter of fact-finding.


Author(s):  
In-Sue Oh

Secondary uses of meta-analytic data (SUMAD) represent advanced analyses and applications of first-order meta-analytic results for theoretical (e.g., theory testing) and practical (e.g., evidence-based practice) purposes to produce novel knowledge that cannot be directly obtained from the input meta-analytic results. First-order meta-analytic results in the form of bivariate effect sizes have been used as input to such secondary analyses and applications. Given the increasing popularity of SUMAD in human resource management (HRM) and organizational behavior (OB), there is a need for a systematic review on this topic. This article has two primary goals. First, it reviews essential works regarding SUMAD in the fields of HRM/OB and provides taxonomies of SUMAD in theoretical and practical domains. Second, it introduces recent SUMAD and discusses future directions that encourage more innovative and rigorous research endeavors along this line.


1978 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 902-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
ARTHUR P. BRIEF

1980 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-166
Author(s):  
PATRICK E. CONNOR

1980 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-46
Author(s):  
ORLANDO BEHLING

1984 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 903-904
Author(s):  
Stephan J. Motowidlo

1988 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1074-1076
Author(s):  
John J. Furedy
Keyword(s):  

1988 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 320-321
Author(s):  
Lawrence K. Williams

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document