Review of Characteristics of Children's Behavior Disorders. 3rd ed.

1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 742-742
Author(s):  
Philip C. Kendall
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohana Agatha Christina Ongkowidjojo ◽  
Herlan Praktikto

This study aims to determine the effect of the use of behavior therapy with behavioristic methods for behavior disorders of children with autism. These behavioral disorders in the form of angry, crying, jumping behavior that appears when attending lessons at school. This research is an experimental type research. The method used is an experimental method with a single research subject or Single Subject Research (SSR). The research design used is Within Subject Design. The subject of the study was a 3-year-old boy in a private school in Surabaya. Data collection techniques through observation checklist of autistic children's behavior, and observation. The results of the analysis show that there is a positive influence on the use of behavioral therapy with positive reinforcement methods for autistic children's behavior disorders in the form of angry, crying and jumping behaviors. The behavior decreased after being given behavioristic therapy (Operant Conditioning)  by giving positive reinforcement in the form of praise and hugs. Positive reinforcement is given as a reward each time after the subject has targeted the behavior. The target behavior is angry, crying and jumping when in class. The behavior decreases when the child comes to school to take lessons in class.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1950 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-37
Author(s):  
CHARLES BRADLEY

The effect of benzedrine® (dl-amphetamine) and dexedrine® (d-amphetamine) sulfates upon the behavior of maladjusted children was studied in the somewhat controlled setting of a children's psychiatric hospital. Twelve years' experience with these drugs is reported involving observations upon 275 children who received benzedrine®, 113 who received dexedrine® and 82 who received both preparations. The most frequent optimal daily dose was 20 mg. of benzedrine® and 10 mg. of dexedrine®. Specific behavior responses to both drugs approximated one another both in quality and frequency, with 50 to 60% of the children becoming more subdued, 15 to 25% showing no change, 20% showing increased activity and 5% showing an acceleration of school progress only. Clinically these reactions indicated 60 to 75% symptomatic improvement, 15 to 25% no change and 10 to 15% unfavorable responses. Children with a variety of clinical diagnoses were benefited with no evidence of tolerance or addiction following prolonged administration. Occasional undesirable physiologic side effects were noted with both preparations, most frequently during the first few days of treatment only. Approximately equal numbers of children responded more favorably to one drug in contrast to the other. In general benzedrine® was found to produce the more dramatic results, except with individual children in whom its side effects were more pronounced, in which cases dexedrine® proved more advantageous. The conclusion is drawn that these drugs influence children's behavior by altering their emotional reactions to distressing situations. Both offer the practitioner readily available and easily controlled pharmacologic approaches to the symptomatic treatment of children's behavior disorders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document