Hard evidence

1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-190
Author(s):  
Robert D. Stolorow ◽  
Bernard Brandchaft ◽  
George E. Atwood
Keyword(s):  
JAMA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 321 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Voelker
Keyword(s):  

Bone ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. S75-S76
Author(s):  
W. Eugene
Keyword(s):  

Science News ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
W. Stolzenburg
Keyword(s):  

Mammalia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Schley ◽  
Marianne Jacobs ◽  
Sebastian Collet ◽  
Alexander Kristiansen ◽  
Jan Herr

Abstract Considering the spread of the grey wolf (Canis lupus) in Europe over the past 30 years, Luxembourg took some measures to prepare for the return of this apex predator, including the establishment of a management plan that notably addresses the issue of wolf depredation on livestock. Here we present the results of genetic analyses of putative wolf saliva, hair and scat samples collected from or near prey carcasses between 2015 and 2020. In two cases, the wolf was confirmed via DNA analysis: in July 2017 near Garnich and in April 2020 near Niederanven, both assigned to category C1 (hard evidence). A third case was classified as C2 (confirmed observation) based on prey carcass characteristics, while genetic analysis yielded no result. These are the first confirmed records of wolves in Luxemburg since 1893. Moreover, the two C1-cases originated from the Alpine (Garnich) and Central European (Niederanven) populations. Given similar developments in the neighboring countries and regions, we conclude that the area including the Benelux countries as well as Rhineland-Palatinate, Saarland and Northern France may well become a melting pot for wolves of the two aforementioned populations in the coming years and decades.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 817-818
Author(s):  
Michael S. Kramer ◽  
I. B. Pless

We read with surprise and considerable alarm Dr Crook's editorial concerning the role of scientific proof in medical practice. Unfortunately, he appears to confound the admittedly problematic philosophical construct of "proof" with the basic tenets of the scientific method. It is one thing to argue that scientific proof is difficult to define, but quite another to then conclude that opinion, even enlightened and informed opinion, is preferable to hard evidence as the principal criterion for assessing the efficacy of medical treatment.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fidel Garrido Carretero

<p>This paper presents the virtual reconstruction of the Islamic palace of Onda (Castellón), a site where recent excavations have brought to light an important set of structures dating from the 11th century. Its poor state of preservation allowed a fairly complete reading of the palace plan but there was no hard evidence regarding its elevations. In the context of an ongoing study of the site, a virtual reconstruction of the palace was undertaken in order to facilitate the process of trial and error involved in figuring out its original configuration. A method devised to test reconstructive hypotheses on an active archaeological site is presented, followed by a discussion of results that encompasses the architecture and the urban and regional context of the site.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document