When trying to understand detracts from trying to behave: Effects of perspective taking in intergroup interaction.

2009 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 811-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacquie D. Vorauer ◽  
Verena Martens ◽  
Stacey J. Sasaki
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minjie Li

The emerging intergroup perspective-taking narrative has become a mainstream representational strategy in the rise of transgender media visibility. Taking an experimental design approach, this study investigates how narrative perspective (Ingroup Perspective vs. Outgroup Perspective) interacts with intergroup interaction depiction (Positive vs. Negative) in transgender-related media content to redirect people’s attitudes toward transgender people, transportation, and elevation responses. The findings reveal that the outgroup perspective is more likely to elicit 1) positive attitudes toward the featured transgender character and the transgender outgroup; 2) transportation; and 3) meaningful affect, mixed affect, and motivational responses. However, the positive depiction of transgender-cisgender intergroup interaction only prompts positive attitudes toward the transgender character, meaningful affect, and physical responses. Implications of such intergroup communication strategies in public interest communications are discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel G. B. Johnson

AbstractZero-sum thinking and aversion to trade pervade our society, yet fly in the face of everyday experience and the consensus of economists. Boyer & Petersen's (B&P's) evolutionary model invokes coalitional psychology to explain these puzzling intuitions. I raise several empirical challenges to this explanation, proposing two alternative mechanisms – intuitive mercantilism (assigning value to money rather than goods) and errors in perspective-taking.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan S. Chiaburu ◽  
Ann Chunyan Peng ◽  
Linn Van Dyne

We conducted an experiment to examine the effect of how subordinates present ideas (constructive vs. complaining form) on supervisor (receiver) responses (perceptions of subordinate intrusiveness and of overall performance). We demonstrated a joint effect of subordinate idea presentation (manipulated) and supervisor dogmatism (measured) such that supervisors with high levels of dogmatism rated subordinates who presented voice constructively as more intrusive and lower in performance than those with low dogmatism. Supervisor perspective taking mediated these relationships. Our findings highlight the importance of presenting ideas in a constructive form to receivers with low levels of dogmatism.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacquie D. Vorauer ◽  
Matthew Quesnel
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystal T. Tse ◽  
Christine Logel ◽  
Steven J. Spencer
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document