scholarly journals Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: Alternative accounts and underlying processes.

2010 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Tausch ◽  
Miles Hewstone ◽  
Jared B. Kenworthy ◽  
Charis Psaltis ◽  
Katharina Schmid ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Pettigrew

This paper reviews the evidence for a secondary transfer effect of intergroup contact. Following a contact’s typical primary reduction in prejudice toward the outgroup involved in the contact, this effect involves a further, secondary reduction in prejudice toward noninvolved outgroups. Employing longitudinal German probability samples, we found that significant secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact exist, but they were limited to specific outgroups that are similar to the contacted outgroup in perceived stereotypes, status or stigma. Since the contact-prejudice link is bidirectional, the effect is inflated when prior prejudice reducing contact is not controlled. The strongest evidence derives from experimental research. Both cognitive (dissonance) and affective (evaluative conditioning) explanations for the effect are offered.


2012 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Schmid ◽  
Miles Hewstone ◽  
Beate Küpper ◽  
Andreas Zick ◽  
Ulrich Wagner

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 430-435
Author(s):  
Rose Meleady ◽  
Richard J. Crisp ◽  
Gordon Hodson ◽  
Megan Earle

The contact hypothesis proposes that bringing groups together under favorable conditions can improve intergroup relations. It is now well established that intergroup contact can improve attitudes not only toward the out-group as a whole but also toward other, noncontacted groups ( secondary transfer effect). We review evidence of a further, higher-order generalization effect whereby intergroup contact also impacts more general cognitive processes outside of the intergroup context (i.e., tertiary transfer effects). We present a taxonomy of transfer effects that explains these generalization effects as distinct outcomes of the contact process yet contingent on the same component process, specifically, the assessment of the semantic distance between the target (e.g., contacted individual) and the frame (e.g., group prototype). This conceptualization provides an explanatory framework for uniting the disparate forms of transfer effect in the contact literature, clarifying why primary and secondary transfer effects are facilitated by low semantic distance and why contact is more cognitively demanding under conditions of high semantic distance, but with greater potential for cognitive growth.


2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake Harwood ◽  
Stefania Paolini ◽  
Nick Joyce ◽  
Mark Rubin ◽  
Analisa Arroyo

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1066-1084
Author(s):  
Loris Vezzali ◽  
Gian Antonio Di Bernardo ◽  
Michèle D. Birtel ◽  
Sofia Stathi ◽  
Marco Brambilla

The secondary transfer effect (STE), defined as contact with a primary outgroup improving attitudes towards a secondary outgroup uninvolved in contact, has mainly been studied with reference to direct contact and considering attitude generalization as the main mediating mechanism. Using a majority (422 Italians) and minority (130 immigrants) adolescent sample from high schools in Italy, we examined outgroup morality perceptions as a new mediating mechanism, and tested for the first time whether the STE emerges for extended contact. Results revealed that the STE emerged for direct contact among the majority group and for extended contact among the minority group, and it was sequentially mediated by perceptions of morality towards the primary outgroup, and by attitudes towards the primary outgroup and perceptions of morality towards the secondary outgroup. The STE also emerged for direct contact among the minority group, with morality perceptions towards the secondary outgroup and attitudes towards the primary outgroup being parallel mediators. We discuss the theoretical implications of the findings, arguing that it is important to identify the conditions and underlying processes of the STE in order to reduce prejudice in the case of both majority and minority groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document