Secondary transfer effects from imagined contact: Group similarity affects the generalization gradient

2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake Harwood ◽  
Stefania Paolini ◽  
Nick Joyce ◽  
Mark Rubin ◽  
Analisa Arroyo
2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Pettigrew

This paper reviews the evidence for a secondary transfer effect of intergroup contact. Following a contact’s typical primary reduction in prejudice toward the outgroup involved in the contact, this effect involves a further, secondary reduction in prejudice toward noninvolved outgroups. Employing longitudinal German probability samples, we found that significant secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact exist, but they were limited to specific outgroups that are similar to the contacted outgroup in perceived stereotypes, status or stigma. Since the contact-prejudice link is bidirectional, the effect is inflated when prior prejudice reducing contact is not controlled. The strongest evidence derives from experimental research. Both cognitive (dissonance) and affective (evaluative conditioning) explanations for the effect are offered.


2012 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Schmid ◽  
Miles Hewstone ◽  
Beate Küpper ◽  
Andreas Zick ◽  
Ulrich Wagner

2010 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Tausch ◽  
Miles Hewstone ◽  
Jared B. Kenworthy ◽  
Charis Psaltis ◽  
Katharina Schmid ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 430-435
Author(s):  
Rose Meleady ◽  
Richard J. Crisp ◽  
Gordon Hodson ◽  
Megan Earle

The contact hypothesis proposes that bringing groups together under favorable conditions can improve intergroup relations. It is now well established that intergroup contact can improve attitudes not only toward the out-group as a whole but also toward other, noncontacted groups ( secondary transfer effect). We review evidence of a further, higher-order generalization effect whereby intergroup contact also impacts more general cognitive processes outside of the intergroup context (i.e., tertiary transfer effects). We present a taxonomy of transfer effects that explains these generalization effects as distinct outcomes of the contact process yet contingent on the same component process, specifically, the assessment of the semantic distance between the target (e.g., contacted individual) and the frame (e.g., group prototype). This conceptualization provides an explanatory framework for uniting the disparate forms of transfer effect in the contact literature, clarifying why primary and secondary transfer effects are facilitated by low semantic distance and why contact is more cognitively demanding under conditions of high semantic distance, but with greater potential for cognitive growth.


Author(s):  
Anna Soveri ◽  
Eric P. A. Karlsson ◽  
Otto Waris ◽  
Petra Grönholm-Nyman ◽  
Matti Laine

Abstract. In a randomized controlled trial, we investigated the pattern of near transfer effects of working memory (WM) training with an adaptive auditory-visuospatial dual n-back training task in healthy young adults. The results revealed significant task-specific transfer to an untrained single n-back task, and more general near transfer to a WM updating composite score plus a nearly significant effect on a composite score measuring interference control in WM. No transfer effects were seen on Active or Passive WM composites. The results are discussed in the light of cognitive versus strategy-related overlap between training and transfer tasks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document