Measuring intimate partner violence among male and female farmworkers in San Diego County, Ca.

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Duke ◽  
Carol B. Cunradi
2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela J. Owen ◽  
Richard E. Heyman ◽  
Amy M. Smith Slep

The impact of male-to-female intimate partner violence (IPV) research on participants is unknown. A measure of impact was given to participants in an IPV study to assess systematically the impact of completing questionnaires, engaging in conflict conversations, and being interviewed individually about anger escalation and de-escalation during the conversations. Participants completed a six-question, Likert-scaled impact measure. Both male and female participants rated the impact of the study as helpful to them personally and to their relationships. Female participants rated different segments of the study as more helpful to themselves and their relationships, while male participants did not find any segment of the study to have a different impact than other segments.


2018 ◽  
Vol 260 ◽  
pp. 98-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke A. Bartlett ◽  
Katherine M. Iverson ◽  
Karen S. Mitchell

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 959-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tricia H. Witte ◽  
Mazheruddin M. Mulla

This study investigated perceived descriptive norms (i.e., perceived prevalence) for intimate partner violence (IPV) among college students. Male and female college students were asked to estimate the prevalence of IPV for same-sex “typical students” on their campus. Perpetrators of IPV made higher estimates than nonperpetrators. Both perpetrators and nonperpetrators overestimated the prevalence of IPV when compared to actual prevalence rates. Findings lend support for using social-norms-based prevention programs on college campuses.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A1.3-A1
Author(s):  
Hitomi D. Hayashi ◽  
T Ludwig-Barron Natasha ◽  
Lindsey J. White ◽  
Monica D. Ulibarn ◽  
Jamila K. Stockman

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 829-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tricia H. Witte ◽  
Christine L. Hackman ◽  
Mazheruddin M. Mulla

This study replicated prior research on college students’ perceived descriptive norms (i.e., prevalence estimates) for intimate partner violence (IPV). In this study, male and female college students were instructed to estimate the prevalence of physical forms of IPV for “typical students” of their same gender on campus. Perpetrators of IPV—both male and female—made higher estimates than nonperpetrators. When compared to actual prevalence rates, both perpetrators and nonperpetrators overestimated the prevalence of IPV on campus. Findings have implications for prevention programs that address social norms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document