A quantum model of strategic decision-making explains the disjunction effect in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game.

Decision ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-54
Author(s):  
Jakub Tesař
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanari Asano ◽  
Irina Basieva ◽  
Andrei Khrennikov ◽  
Masanori Ohya ◽  
Yoshiharu Tanaka

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (03) ◽  
pp. 377-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
TETSUSHI OHDAIRA ◽  
TAKAO TERANO

The condition of cooperation in social conflicts of interest has been an interesting topic. On the one hand people usually desire to make their own profit. On the other hand, they mutually cooperate. This fact has motivated many researchers. Some solutions for this question have been proposed, and particular studies indicate that the diversity in decision-making or relationships promotes cooperation. In this research, we achieve the diversity by utilizing the novel method that refers to the mechanism of correction regarding each probability that every strategy comes to the representative by decision-making of group. This mechanism works when difference between the probability of the first and others becomes quite large. If once every group adopts this corrected decision, he/she achieves mutual cooperation of high level in the sequential prisoner's dilemma game in case the number of strategies (= players) is within the definite range. We also note that this game can effectively describe the property of evolution of strategy only with a small number of players. When each group has many players, in contrast to previous research, the decision with correction also has an effect on the suppression of prevalence of defection. In addition, we also show that the decision of this model is analogous to the system of redistribution of revenue, which provides balance of strength between several teams in professional sports.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e0175492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasia G. Peshkovskaya ◽  
Tatiana S. Babkina ◽  
Mikhail G. Myagkov ◽  
Ivan A. Kulikov ◽  
Ksenia V. Ekshova ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayala Pines

The relative power of cooperative and trusting patterns of behavior versus those of exploitation and distrust in affecting the results of group decision-making processes was investigated. The outcome of a study using the Prisoner's Dilemma Game seems to suggest the disproportionate influence of competitive people in these settings. When groups consisting of cooperative and competitive players were asked to reach a unanimous decision about game strategy, in the majority of cases their decision was not to cooperate. This is a rather disturbing finding in light of the prevalence and importance of group decisions in everyday life. Three additional studies were carried out in an attempt to explore some alternative explanations of this shift to competition. The combined outcome of the three studies suggests that the shift to competition is reflecting both a group effect and a player effect.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa Haesevoets ◽  
Dries H. Bostyn ◽  
Chris Reinders Folmer ◽  
Arne Roets ◽  
Alain Van Hiel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document