Curriculum-based measurement & problem-solving educational assessment

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mollie S. McKibben ◽  
Patricia L. Ball ◽  
Mark R. Shinn
2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Steer ◽  
Francis Gentle

This paper recommends an approach to educational assessment of students who are blind or vision impaired which takes into account both issues of integrity and educational accommodations that 'level the paying field'. The paper provides a taxonomy of the variety of educational assessment accommodations available for formal and informal tasks in assessing students who are blind or vision impaired. Teachers can enhance educational integrity by ensuring the participation of students in the development of appropriate educational accommodations, and by facilitating the development of students' self-advocacy and problem solving skills.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (71) ◽  
pp. 386
Author(s):  
Gustavo Danicki Aureliano Rosa ◽  
Afonso Celso Tanus Galvão

<p>Desenvolve-se uma análise de protocolos verbais de processos de estudo, tendo como inspiração a taxonomia de objetivos educacionais de Bloom et al. (1977), para a geração de subsídios para a avaliação educacional. Os protocolos foram gerados a partir da entrevista com seis indivíduos que realizaram o estudo com materiais de domínio e não domínio inferido. Os resultados da pesquisa sugerem que: i) informações importantes para o realinhamento das ações em uma situação de ensino e aprendizagem podem ser obtidas, tais como termos-chave que tenham significado para os indivíduos e que estejam inseridos em materiais de não domínio; e ii)  uma categorização como a proposta neste estudo para a tomada de decisão pode contribuir para o trabalho efetivo do estudante em situações adequadas ao seu nível de desenvolvimento rumo ao domínio completo de determinado material de estudo.</p><p><strong>Palavras-chave:</strong> Avaliação da Educação, Taxonomia, Resolução de Problemas, Desenvolvimento Cognitivo.</p><p>  </p><p><em><strong>Procesos de estudio y evaluación del aprendizaje en el desarrollo de la expertise</strong></em></p><p><em>Se desarrolla un análisis de protocolos verbales de procesos de estudio, cuya inspiración es la taxonomía de objetivos educacionales de Bloom et al. (1977), a fin de generar subsidios para la evaluación educacional. Los protocolos se originaron a partir de la entrevista con seis individuos que realizaron el estudio con materiales de dominio y no dominio inferido. Los resultados de la investigación sugieren que: i) se pueden obtener informaciones importantes para la realineación de las acciones en una situación de enseñanza y aprendizaje, tales como términos clave que tengan significado para los individuos y que estén insertos en materiales de no dominio; y ii)  una categorización como la propuesta en este estudio para la toma de decisión puede contribuir para el trabajo efectivo del estudiante en situaciones adecuadas a su nivel de desarrollo rumbo al dominio completo de un determinado material de estudio.</em></p><p><em><strong>Palabras clave:</strong> Evaluación de la Educación, Taxonomía, Resolución de Problemas, Desarrollo Cognitivo.</em></p><p><em>  </em></p><p><em><strong>Learning processes and learning assessment for expertise development</strong></em></p><p><em>An analysis of verbal protocols of learning processes, and their categorization based on Bloom’s et al. (1977) taxonomy of educational objectives, is developed to generate subsidies for an educational assessment of learning processes. The participants were six academics who were observed while solving problems involving domain and non-domain material. Results suggest that: i) knowledge that is relevant for the realignment of actions in situations of teaching, such as keywords that are meaningful for individuals that can be obtained even when inserted into nondomain materials; and ii) categorizations such as the ones proposed for this study can contribute to the effectiveness of students’ learning processes in situations that are appropriate for their level of development and towards the mastery of study content.</em></p><p><em><strong>Keywords:</strong> Educational Assessment, Taxonomy, Problem Solving, Cognitive Development.</em></p>


2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 282-288
Author(s):  
Christina Nugent

Have you ever wondered how many blades of grass are on a football field? The students in my fifth-grade class did and in the process learned a lot about estimation strategies, multiplication, measurement, problem solving, and communication.


Author(s):  
Alice Lemmo

Abstract Comparative studies on paper and pencil– and computer-based tests principally focus on statistical analysis of students’ performances. In educational assessment, comparing students’ performance (in terms of right or wrong results) does not imply a comparison of problem-solving processes followed by students. In this paper, we present a theoretical tool for task analysis that allows us to highlight how students’ problem-solving processes could change in switching from paper to computer format and how these changes could be affected by the use of one environment rather than another. In particular, the aim of our study lies in identifying a set of indexes to highlight possible consequences that specific changes in task formulation have, in terms of task comparability. Therefore, we propose an example of the use of the tool for comparing paper-based and computer-based tasks.


2002 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Konya Weishaar ◽  
Phillip M. Weishaar ◽  
Christy Budt

Reform changes were piloted by a rural special education cooperative in southern Illinois. This article describes the process used in one component of the reform, use of a problem-solving model at the prereferral level where curriculum-based measurement was a primary assessment. One observation was that fewer referrals were made for special education evaluations after the problem-solving model was put in place. Suggestions for improvement to the prereferral process are made.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document