STEM Careers

2009 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Cadaret ◽  
Suzette L. Speight ◽  
Paul J. Hartung ◽  
Linda M. Subich ◽  
Ingrid K. Weigold

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Slattery ◽  
◽  
Kurtz K. Miller ◽  
Douglas Brown ◽  
D. Mark Jones ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (5) ◽  
pp. 909-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher S. Rozek ◽  
Ryan C. Svoboda ◽  
Judith M. Harackiewicz ◽  
Chris S. Hulleman ◽  
Janet S. Hyde

During high school, developing competence in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is critically important as preparation to pursue STEM careers, yet students in the United States lag behind other countries, ranking 35th in mathematics and 27th in science achievement internationally. Given the importance of STEM careers as drivers of modern economies, this deficiency in preparation for STEM careers threatens the United States’ continued economic progress. In the present study, we evaluated the long-term effects of a theory-based intervention designed to help parents convey the importance of mathematics and science courses to their high-school–aged children. A prior report on this intervention showed that it promoted STEM course-taking in high school; in the current follow-up study, we found that the intervention improved mathematics and science standardized test scores on a college preparatory examination (ACT) for adolescents by 12 percentile points. Greater high-school STEM preparation (STEM course-taking and ACT scores) was associated with increased STEM career pursuit (i.e., STEM career interest, the number of college STEM courses, and students’ attitudes toward STEM) 5 y after the intervention. These results suggest that the intervention can affect STEM career pursuit indirectly by increasing high-school STEM preparation. This finding underscores the importance of targeting high-school STEM preparation to increase STEM career pursuit. Overall, these findings demonstrate that a motivational intervention with parents can have important effects on STEM preparation in high school, as well as downstream effects on STEM career pursuit 5 y later.


2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl J. Craig ◽  
Paige Evans ◽  
Rakesh Verma ◽  
Donna Stokes ◽  
Jing Li
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 117-140
Author(s):  
Lore Van Praag ◽  
Roslyn Arlin Mickelson ◽  
Peter A.J. Stevens ◽  
Mieke Van Houtte

This article explores why some Flemish secondary school students’ study choices are content-wise not in line with their career aspirations and, to some extent, follow gender and ethnic patterns. We use 83 semi-structured interviews, conducted with students in academic and technical tracks in three Flemish secondary schools. Compared to female pupils, male pupils are more likely to enrol in lower status tracks whose curricular substance prepares them for a STEM career (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics). Ethnic majority female pupils seem to adjust their study choices better to their aspirations, or the other way round. However, especially when changing track or field of study, ethnic majority female pupils are more likely to adapt their aspirations consistent with gender norms. While ethnic minority female pupils are more likely than ethnic majority female pupils to have STEM aspirations, their goals do not always seem to correspond with the study choices they have made. Additionally, perceived discrimination and family aspirations further impact both study choices and aspirations of ethnic minority pupils. Gendered study recommendations and choices, favouring male pupils in STEM careers, especially make that female pupils make study choices that are in terms of curriculum not always in line with their aspirations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document