Perceptions of Future Dangerousness Testimony in Sexual Predator Commitment Cases

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel D. Lieberman ◽  
Daniel A. Krauss
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shan A. Jumper ◽  
Michael Bednarz ◽  
Raymond Wood

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt DeLisi ◽  
Ed A. Munoz
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 99-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Sugarman ◽  
Geoff Dickens

Aims and MethodThe assessment of the future dangerousness of firesetters is problematical but psychiatrists may be requested to perform assessment of arsonists for the courts. We surveyed the views of psychiatrists and others (n=54) on how 11 candidate historical variables might contribute to future dangerousness.ResultsHierarchical cluster analysis indicated that variables fell into three groups related to level of perceived dangerousness. Apparent intention to endanger life and setting fire to an occupied building were the items thought by psychiatrists to most indicate highest future dangerousness. Having previously set fires that caused extensive damage, failure to extinguish previous fires or alert the authorities were perceived as indicating moderate future dangerousness.Clinical ImplicationsThe study adds to what is known about how psychiatrists formulate assessments of future dangerousness.


2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 497-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
George B Palermo
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric S. Janus ◽  
Robert A. Prentky
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Cunningham ◽  
Jon R. Sorensen ◽  
Thomas J. Reidy
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
CLAUDIA CARDEI ◽  
TRAIAN REBEDEA

AbstractThis paper presents a system developed for detecting sexual predators in online chat conversations using a two-stage classification and behavioral features. A sexual predator is defined as a person who tries to obtain sexual favors in a predatory manner, usually with underage people. The proposed approach uses several text categorization methods and empirical behavioral features developed especially for the task at hand. After investigating various approaches for solving the sexual predator identification problem, we have found that a two-stage classifier achieves the best results. In the first stage, we employ a Support Vector Machine classifier to distinguish conversations having suspicious content from safe online discussions. This is useful as most chat conversations in real life do not contain a sexual predator, therefore it can be viewed as a filtering phase that enables the actual detection of predators to be done only for suspicious chats that contain a sexual predator with a very high degree. In the second stage, we detect which of the users in a suspicious discussion is an actual predator using a Random Forest classifier. The system was tested on the corpus provided by the PAN 2012 workshop organizers and the results are encouraging because, as far as we know, our solution outperforms all previous approaches developed for solving this task.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document