Employment Interview Research: Where Do We Go Next?

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoris S. Culbertson ◽  
Murray R. Barrick ◽  
Allen I. Huffcutt ◽  
Therese H. Macan ◽  
Michael A. McDaniel
1995 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 11-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Ilkka

As a topic within the larger corpus of materials on selection interviewing, applicant appearance has been addressed through advice giving, folk wisdom, and other prescrip tions. As presented, such materials tend to undermine opportunities for issue identification and assessment. Through review and interpretation of that employment interview research which addresses the relationship between applicant appearance and interviewer selection decisions, the purpose of this paper is to encourage those who teach, train, and counsel others on employment inter viewing to devote more studied attention to appearance issues and ethics. To that end, five instructional proposi tions are offered. Each proposition is developed through review of related research and then capped by instructional observations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1156-1175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Riaz Hamdani ◽  
Sorin Valcea ◽  
Michael Ronald Buckley

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to focus on the suitability of the multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix approach for examining construct validity in human resource management (HRM) research. The authors also provide a number of suggestions on how to use MTMM more effectively in HRM research. Design/methodology/approach The authors start by presenting a basic introduction to MTMM approach. Next the authors briefly review the limitations of MTMM approach and suggested improvements. The authors elaborate on these limitations by providing HRM examples. To further illustrate these issues, the authors review employment interview research. Findings The construct validity analysis in HRM research suffers from three problematic assumptions of the classical MTMM approach: uncorrelated trait-method units, uncorrelated methods, and uncorrelated traits. The review of interview research shows that classical MTMM approach is by far the most popular approach given its relative simplicity and modest sample size requirements. This popularity stresses the significance of the review in highlighting these issues. Originality/value Several improvements to quantify the interpretations of MTMM analysis are available to researchers. This review closely examines how these limitations and proposed improvements influence HRM research, thereby making the methodological advances concerning the MTMM approach more accessible to HRM researchers and practitioners.


Author(s):  
Patrick Raymark ◽  
Melinda Keith ◽  
Heather Odle-Dusseau ◽  
Gary Giumetti ◽  
Brandy Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Lodato ◽  
Filip Lievens ◽  
Scott Highhouse

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Conway ◽  
Allen I. Huffcutt ◽  
Bridget Settino

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document