Developmental differences in feature memory and feature binding

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Lorsbach ◽  
Jason F. Reimer
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Picard ◽  
Maria Abram ◽  
Eric Orriols ◽  
Pascale Piolino

The majority of episodic memory (EM) tests are far removed from what we experience in daily life and from the definition of this type of memory. This study examines the developmental trajectory of the main aspects of episodic memory—what, where, and when—and of feature binding in a naturalistic virtual environment. A population of 125 participants aged from 6 to 24 years was asked to navigate, by using a joystick, in a virtual urban environment composed of specific areas, and to memorize as many elements as possible (e.g., scenes, details, spatial and temporal contexts). The ability to recall factual content associated to details or spatiotemporal context increased steadily from the age of 8 to young adulthood. These results indicate main developmental differences in feature binding abilities in naturalistic events which are very sensitive to age in comparison with a standard EM assessment. Virtual reality therefore appears to be an appropriate technique to assess crucial aspects of EM development in children and adolescents and it should provide helpful tools for the detection of subtle memory deficits.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie L. Earles ◽  
Alan W. Kersten ◽  
Laura L. Vernon ◽  
Rachel Starkings

1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank C. Verhulst

In this article, recent developments in the assessment and diagnosis of child psychopathology are discussed with an emphasis on standardized methodologies that provide data that can be scored on empirically derived groupings of problems that tend to co-occur. Assessment methodologies are highlighted that especially take account of the following three basic characteristics of child psychopathology: (1) the quantitative nature of child psychopathology; (2) the role of developmental differences in the occurrence of problem behaviors, and (3) the need for multiple informants. Cross-cultural research is needed to test the applicability of assessment procedures across different settings as well as the generalizability of taxonomic constructs. Assessments of children in different cultures can be compared or pooled to arrive at a multicultural knowledge base which may be much stronger than knowledge based on only one culture. It is essential to avoid assuming that data from any single source reveal the significance of particular problems. Instead, comprehensive assessment of psychopathology requires coordination of multisource data using a multiaxial assessment approach.


2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (5) ◽  
pp. 467-477
Author(s):  
Anthea A. Stylianakis ◽  
Rick Richardson ◽  
Kathryn D. Baker

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Lorsbach ◽  
Jason F. Reimer ◽  
Mary J. Friehe

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M. Elliott ◽  
Kenneth Barideaux ◽  
Alicia M. Briganti

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document