Stability of aggressive behavior and its relation to psychosocial functioning in women and men in the Finnish longitudinal study

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Kokko ◽  
Lea Pulkkinen
2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 1266-1274
Author(s):  
Dong-Mei ZHAO ◽  
Zong-Kui ZHOU ◽  
Xiao-Jun SUN ◽  
Hsueh Yeh ◽  
Cohen Robert

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 1105-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Burris ◽  
Jessica N. Rivera-Rivera ◽  
Kent Armeson ◽  
Jane Zapka ◽  
Anthony J. Alberg ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
CAROL MACKINNON–LEWIS ◽  
MICHAEL E. LAMB ◽  
JOHN HATTIE ◽  
LAILA P. BARADARAN

This study tested an integrative, multipathway model designed to explain bidirectional effects of the attributions and coercive behaviors of mothers and sons in the context of a longitudinal study. Subjects were 246 mothers and sons who were 7–9 years of age. Mothers' and sons' attributions about one another's intent were significantly related to the aggressiveness of the behavior that each of them directed toward the other. Boys' earlier aggression did not significantly predict the mothers' subsequent attributions, whereas mothers' negative behavior indeed predicted subsequent negative attributions on the part of the boys. Even after considering children's earlier negative behavior, children's negative attributions about their mothers helped explain the aggressiveness of their subsequent behavior. The same was not true for mothers whose earlier attributions indirectly influenced their subsequent aggressive behavior.


2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Laninga-Wijnen ◽  
Zeena Harakeh ◽  
Jan Kornelis Dijkstra ◽  
René Veenstra ◽  
Wilma Vollebergh

This longitudinal study examined the extent to which the development of prosocial and aggressive peer norms was related to individual prosocial and aggressive behavior development across the first year of secondary education (three waves, n = 1,134 adolescents from 51 classes, Mage = 12.66). A distinction was made between descriptive norms (the aggregated average peer-perceived behavior within the classroom) and status norms (the within-classroom correlation between peer-perceived popularity and behavior). Results indicated that descriptive norms represented a stable, static peer ecology, whereas status norms were somewhat more dynamic and changed across the school year. The development of descriptive and status norms was associated with initial levels of individual prosocial and aggressive behavior, whereas the development of status norms was also associated with the development of prosocial behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document