Management Brief: Study Examines Antipsychotic Prescribing Practices

2001 ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Pappadopulos ◽  
P. S. Jensen ◽  
S. B. Schur ◽  
J. C. MacIntyre ◽  
S. Ketner ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-140
Author(s):  
Tunde Apantaku-Olajide ◽  
Abid Khattak ◽  
Peter Whitty

AbstractObjectives:Despite the clinical guidelines regarding the use of combined antipsychotics and the limited evidence for its benefits, use remains high in psychiatric practice. The aim of this study was to examine prescribing practices and investigate reasons for initiating and continuing combined antipsychotics in stable psychiatric illnesses.Method:A cross-sectional case record survey of antipsychotic prescribing practices in a community psychiatric rehabilitation service. A total sample (n = 75) of patients with chronic and enduring psychiatric illnesses was studied. The age, gender, diagnosis and prescribed antipsychotics were examined. The proportional prevalence and documented reasons for combined antipsychotic prescribing were analysed.Results:Seventy-three of the 75 patients were prescribed antipsychotic mediations. Of these, 44 (60%) received a combination of two or more antipsychotics. The most common reason for combined prescribing was a switch of antipsychotic (n = 18; 41%). No reason was documented in 19 cases (43%).Conclusions:In this study, slow cross-tapering or incomplete switch process of antipsychotics contributed to the prolonged period of combined antipsychotics treatment. Adequate documentation regarding indication and review of medications cannot be overemphasized.


Author(s):  
Thomas Uttaro ◽  
Molly Finnerty ◽  
Thomas White ◽  
Rosanne Gaylor ◽  
Lawrence Shindelman

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Barbara Giles ◽  
Lesya Gamorak ◽  
Arlene Adanza ◽  
Joy Gicale ◽  
Frances McCarthy

Abstract Background The management of non cognitive symptoms of dementia can be challenging for people living with dementia and their carers. The risks and limited benefit of antipsychotics in this setting is well documented however despite this they still are often prescribed. A previous study at our facility in 2016 highlighted a high prevalence of antipsychotic prescribing at 35% (Bambrick, et al. 2016). As a result of this, multidisciplinary psychotropic review meetings were established and are ongoing. Methods Two wards in our community nursing unit were selected. Inclusion criteria included residency > 6 months. The case notes, medication lists (admission and current prescriptions), and psychotropic review meeting notes were reviewed. Results 43 residents were included in the study. 72% (n=31) were female. The average age was 85 years. 74% (n= 32) of residents had a documented dementia diagnosis. On admission, 7 residents were taking regular antipsychotics. 5 of these medications were subsequently either reduced or discontinued. At the time of the study, 16% (n=7) were prescribed regular antipsychotics. There was a definite indication for 3 of these (schizoaffective disorder, psychosis, paranoid depression). 1 resident had a traumatic brain injury with associated distressing symptoms with harm incidents. 3 had a dementia diagnosis with associated distressing symptoms. A further 14% (n= 6) were prescribed antipsychotics on a PRN basis. 5 had a documented diagnosis of dementia with associated distressing symptoms. None of these residents received these medications in the 4 weeks prior to the study. Conclusion Significant improvements are noted since 2016 with the overall prevalence of antipsychotic prescribing decreasing from 35% to 16%, with the majority of these prescriptions having a clear indication. It is reassuring that residents are not receiving prn medications frequently. We await the national clinical guidance on “Appropriate Prescribing of Psychotropic Medication in People with Dementia” to further guide our practice.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 442-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle K. Strack ◽  
Susan G. Leckband ◽  
Jonathan M. Meyer

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bushra Elhusein ◽  
Yassin Eltorki ◽  
Oraib Abdallah ◽  
Mohamed El Tahir

Purpose Review of antipsychotic prescribing practices, rationale and follow-up using an internationally standardized audit can be an effective tool to encourage and monitor best practices. The purpose of this study is to audit the current prescribing pattern for people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours in Qatar. Design/methodology/approach This study was based on the challenging behaviour management guidelines recommended by the Royal College of Psychiatrists. All current electronic medical records in the Mental Health Service-Hamad Medical Corporation were examined to identify patients with intellectual disabilities who received antipsychotics for challenging behaviour. Demographic variables, such as age, sex and nationality, were collected. In addition, details of psychiatric diagnoses, prescribed psychotropic medications and diagnoses of epilepsy were also collected. For patients who were prescribed antipsychotic medication, the clinical rationale for such medication was collected along with evidence of side effect monitoring to allow performance against the audit standards to be measured. Findings This is the first audit on prescribing practices in people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour in the state of Qatar. The results of this study regarding the pattern of prescribing practices for patients with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour reflect the limitation in knowledge and experience among non-specialist practitioners within mental health service. The result may be helpful to support the development of specialist service provision to improve the care for such vulnerable group. The result may also help other medical centres and clinicians by providing an improved understanding of possible deviations from the best medical practices. Originality/value This is the first audit on prescribing practices in people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour in the state of Qatar. The study is also noteworthy as, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is one of only a few studies on antipsychotic prescribing for patients with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour in the Middle East; therefore, it will be useful in raising awareness and promoting the best practices in the Middle East region. This study is also among the first few studies that were designed based on the four audit standards by the Royal College of Psychiatrists in this area.


2003 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott W. Woods ◽  
Michelle C. Sullivan ◽  
Elizabeth C. Neuse ◽  
Esperanza Diaz ◽  
C. Bruce Baker ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document