Transforming inter-agency practice activity in an Irish context: Practitioner research from social work and addiction treatment agencies

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liam McCarthy ◽  
Robert O'Driscoll
Author(s):  
Ian Shaw

This chapter looks at several ways in which social work can be understood as being concerned with applying what people know — the application of methods and information for the solving of problems in the lives of those with whom social work practitioners work from day to day. It aims to show that the question of ‘application’ is more difficult than scholars often realise. The chapter delves into recent discussions of the meaning and importance of the ‘impact’ of research, taking as a social work example the question of doing ‘practitioner research’. The emphasis of the discussion is about what scholars know about the experience of doing practitioner research.


2016 ◽  
Vol Volume 9 ◽  
pp. 309-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghoncheh Raheb ◽  
Esmat Khaleghi ◽  
Amir Moghanibashi-Mansourieh ◽  
Ali Farhoudian ◽  
Robab Teymouri

Author(s):  
Caroline McGregor ◽  
Michelle Millar

Abstract The aim of this article is to outline a systemic lifecycle approach to social policy practice in social work. Evidence from the field of parenting and child welfare within an Irish context will be used for illustration. We avail of the work of Nancy Fraser to provide the theoretical framework. Drawing from approaches used mostly in public policy education, we demonstrate how social workers can engage at different stages of that policy lifecycle. In the discussion, we outline possibilities for and challenges to embedding social policy practice in social work education by reflecting on the processes of mediating between recognition, redistribution and representation. We argue that social policy practice should be a constant in social work. This approach should favour parity of participation and collaborative leadership from social work with regard to networking and promotion of different levels of participation with multiple ‘public spheres’. We conclude that the development of social policy practice work as a constant in social work will lead to greater ability to mediate between policies and the individuals affected by them. This would, we believe, enhance greatly the potential for social work to achieve its laudable but still illusory aims of promoting social justice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nerilee Ceatha

INTRODUCTION: This article highlights the importance of ethnographic observations of human–animal bonds (HAB) to inform social work practice and applied social research. It explores the relationship between the author and Bruno, a rescue dog, through conventional ideas on attachment theory, connectedness and containment.METHODS: These perspectives are applied to the author’s experiences of undertaking a PhD on the protective factors that promote LGBTI+ youth wellbeing. This emphasises reflexivity as an integral component of practitioner research, with the potential to explore the complexities and subjectivities of our emotional lives.FINDINGS: Through recognition of the dynamics of attachment, our roles as companion-carers prompt help-seeking to ensure reflective practice and effective caregiving. Our relationships with companion-animals resonate with the process of undertaking a PhD, through prioritising self-care and seeking work–life balance. These ideas are also relevant for collaborative studies underpinned by an iterative research process, described by a Consulting, Conducting, Collaborating and Checking cycle.CONCLUSION: The article concludes with an appeal to social work practitioners and practitioner- researchers to discover ways in which concepts of HAB, and our interconnectedness with all living beings, can be applied to policy, practice and research with those whom we work with, their families and within our broader communities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document