scholarly journals Coping (together) with hate: Strategies used by Mexican-origin families in response to racial–ethnic discrimination.

Author(s):  
Michelle Y. Martin Romero ◽  
Laura M. Gonzalez ◽  
Gabriela L. Stein ◽  
Samantha Alvarado ◽  
Lisa Kiang ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 480-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene J.K. Park ◽  
Han Du ◽  
Lijuan Wang ◽  
David R. Williams ◽  
Margarita Alegría

Author(s):  
Adrian J. Bravo ◽  
Emma Wedell ◽  
Margo C. Villarosa-Hurlocker ◽  
Alison Looby ◽  
Cheryl L. Dickter ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 237802311773719 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Michael Gaddis

Researchers increasingly use correspondence audit studies to study racial/ethnic discrimination in employment, housing, and other domains. Although this method provides strong causal evidence of racial/ethnic discrimination, these claims depend on the signal being clearly conveyed through names. Few studies have pretested individual racial and ethnic perceptions of the names used to examine discrimination. The author conducts a survey experiment in which respondents are asked to identify the races or ethnicities they associate with a series of names. Respondents are provided with combinations of Hispanic and Anglo first and last names. Hispanic first names paired with Anglo last names are least likely to be recognized as Hispanic, while all versions of Hispanic first and last names are highly recognized (≥90 percent). The results suggest that researchers must use caution when trying to signal Hispanic ethnicity in experiments, and prior findings from correspondence audits may be biased from poor signals.


2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Chae ◽  
David T. Takeuchi ◽  
Elizabeth M. Barbeau ◽  
Gary G. Bennett ◽  
Jane Lindsey ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 971-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Livas Stein ◽  
Laura Taylor ◽  
Andrea Kulish ◽  
Laura McLaughlin Gonzalez

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Michael Gaddis

Researchers have used audit studies to provide causal evidence of racial discrimination for nearly 60 years. Although audits are an excellent methodological tool to investigate the “what,” “where,” and “when” aspects of racial-ethnic discrimination, audits are less appropriate, by themselves, to investigate the “how” and “why” aspects of racial-ethnic discrimination. In this article, I review why audit studies are necessary to study racial-ethnic discrimination, the evidence from audit studies, and their limitations. I then argue that scholars should adopt a multimethod approach to audit studies to move from documenting the existence of racial-ethnic discrimination to examining how and why racial-ethnic discrimination occurs. Adoption of this multimethod approach will result in a deeper understanding of racial-ethnic discrimination with the potential to shape both opinions and policy surrounding discrimination.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1266-1266
Author(s):  
E Morris ◽  
V Guzman ◽  
E Tell ◽  
A C Summers ◽  
U S Clark ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective While perceived racial/ethnic discrimination (PD) and HIV can be independently detrimental to cognitive function, it is unclear whether persons living with HIV (PLWH) who experience PD may be at risk for greater cognitive dysfunction than HIV- persons. In a diverse sample, we hypothesized that PD would be related to worse cognition and that this effect would be moderated by HIV status. Participants and Method This cross-sectional study included 53 participants (57% PLWH; 77% African American and 23% Latinx; 45% male; M Age = 54.5 ± 6.1 years; M Education = 12.4 ± 2.2 years) who completed the Perceived Ethnic Discrimination Questionnaire (PEDQ) and a neurocognitive (NC) battery. Variables included education (years); HIV status; PEDQ Total Score and global NC T-score (averaged, demographically-corrected T-scores for all tests). A general linear model examined main and interaction effects of HIV status and PD on global cognitive function. Covariates included depression and urine toxicology status for cocaine and marijuana. Results Greater PD was associated with higher education and greater depression. The model showed that greater PD (β = -.48, p < .05) and lower education (β = -19.0, p < .01) were related to worse global cognitive function. This relationship was moderated by education (β = .59, p < .01), such that the relationship between PD and global cognitive function was stronger in those with higher education. There was no main effect of HIV or HIV*PD interaction on global cognitive function. Conclusions This study demonstrated that greater PD is related to worse global cognitive function and this relationship is stronger in those with more education. While no causal factors can be attributed, racial/ethnic minorities with higher education may be granted greater access to areas with greater structural racism and/or microagressions (i.e., predominantly white workplaces). Future studies should evaluate the role of socioeconomic and workplace diversity when considering discrimination.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document