Predicting the helping alliance with people with a psychiatric disability.

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Calsyn ◽  
Gary A. Morse ◽  
Gary Allen
1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lester Luborsky ◽  
Paul Crits-Christoph ◽  
Leslie Alexander ◽  
Miriam Margolis ◽  
Marjorie Cohen
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce McCulloch ◽  
Ronald J. Ozminkowski ◽  
Brian Cuffel ◽  
Rodney L. Dunn ◽  
William Goldman ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
KRISTY MUIR ◽  
KAREN R FISHER ◽  
DAVID ABELLO ◽  
ANN DADICH

AbstractPeople with mental illness can be profoundly disabled and at risk of social exclusion. Transitional models of supported housing have limited effectiveness in improving community participation. Stable, individualised psychosocial housing support programmes have been found to assist in improving mental health and decreasing hospitalisations, but little is understood about whether or how these programmes facilitate social and community participation. This article argues that, if certain supports are available, supported housing models can assist people with high levels of psychiatric disability to participate meaningfully in the community. To make this case, the article uses findings of a longitudinal evaluation of a supported housing model in Australia: the Housing and Accommodation Support Initiative Stage One (HASI). HASI is a partnership between the New South Wales Government Departments of Health and Housing and non-government organisations. It is a coordinated approach that provides clients with housing and community-based clinical support, as well as support with daily living skills and community participation. An analysis of questionnaire, database, interview and clinical data is used to demonstrate how HASI contributes to increased social and community participation. The article concludes with policy implications for supported housing models that aim to facilitate meaningful community participation for people with mental illness.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
Fabien Gagnon ◽  
Les Kertay

Abstract Claims of occupational psychiatric disability have increased considerably over the past 20 years. To avoid psychiatric disability overdiagnosis, it is important to improve the clinical assessment of mental health work disability. This article discusses general disability issues and their impact on individual well-being, social participation, and frequently associated poverty. It defines the difference between impairment assessment and disability assessment, explores three common disability models, and raises issues about psychiatric disability and its potential overdiagnosis.


Assessment ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 734-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabina Palic ◽  
Michelle Lind Kappel ◽  
Guido Makransky

There are no validated measures of psychiatric disability for traumatized refugees in Western psychiatric care. This is a serious shortcoming as it precludes monitoring of global treatment outcomes in this group, as well as appropriate matching of treatment needs to the disability levels. Using Rasch analysis, we evaluated the psychometrics of the Health of Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) in pretreatment data of consecutive refugee patients ( N = 448) from a Danish psychiatric clinic. Then, we carried out a cross-validation of the pretreatment HoNOS model on posttreatment data from the same group. A revised 10-item HoNOS fit the Rasch model at pretreatment and also showed excellent fit within the cross-validation data. Culture, gender, and need for translation did not exert serious bias on the measure’s performance. The results establish good monitoring properties of the 10-item HoNOS as the first validated measure of psychiatric disability for traumatized refugees in Western psychiatric care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document