Superordinate and subgroup identities as predictors of peace and conflict: The unique content of global citizenship identity.

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Reysen ◽  
Iva Katzarska-Miller
2021 ◽  
pp. 144078332110538
Author(s):  
Quentin Maire

The relationship between global citizenship identity and actions remains an unsettled issue. In this article we use the PISA 2018 survey to explore whether global citizenship identity is associated with a greater likelihood of engaging in ‘globally minded’ practices among young Australians. Descriptive analysis reveals that self-reported global citizenship identity is associated with higher levels of moral cosmopolitanism, more so than with greater intercultural values or with more positive attitudes to immigrants. However, this self-declared identity does not necessarily translate into cosmopolitan action. Statistical modelling shows that, in the Australian context, global citizenship knowledge, values and identity account for a limited proportion of differences in self-reported cosmopolitan action. We argue that a sociological theory of practice helps explain these results. We conclude by highlighting future research opportunities to better understand the social determinants of global citizenship practices, including by exploring out-of-school socialisation and a broader range of cosmopolitan practices.


2020 ◽  
pp. 119-134
Author(s):  
Neriko Musha Doerr ◽  
David Puente ◽  
Uichi Kamiyoshi

2020 ◽  
pp. 002224372097295
Author(s):  
Sharon Ng ◽  
Ali Faraji-Rad ◽  
Rajeev Batra

This research demonstrates that under states of certainty consumers with a relatively stronger global (local) identity prefer global (local) brands, whereas under states of uncertainty, consumers with a relatively stronger global (local) identity prefer local (global) brands. This effect occurs because uncertainty (certainty) activates a divergent (convergent) thinking style, which results in a preference for options that are more distant from (closer to) the identity to which consumers associate more strongly. The effect holds both when individuals’ global-local citizenship identity is measured and when it is manipulated. The research further establishes an important boundary condition for the effect. The effect holds in the citizenship identity context because people normally associate themselves with both local and global citizenship identities, and situational or dispositional factors only influence the degree to which they associate with each identity. The effect does not surface when local-global citizenship identities are construed as interfering, such that holding one identity is conceived as being in conflict with holding the other.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Reysen
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Coleman ◽  
Taly Harel-Marian ◽  
Howard Moskowitz ◽  
Naira Musallam
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document