Memory improvement with wide-awake listeners and with nonclassical guitar music.

Background This study sought to investigate complication rates/perioperative metrics after endoscopic carpal tunnel release (eCTR) via wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet (WALANT) versus sedation or local anesthesia with a tourniquet. Methods Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent an eCTR between April 28, 2018, and December 31, 2019, by 1 of 2 fellowship-trained surgeons at our single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 3 groups: monitored anesthesia care with tourniquet (MT), local anesthesia with tourniquet (LT), and WALANT. Results Inclusion criteria were met by 156 cases; 53 (34%) were performed under MT, 25 (16%) under LT, and 78 (50%) under WALANT. The MT group (46.1 ± 9.7) was statistically younger compared with LT (56.3 ± 14.1, P = .007) and WALANT groups (53.5 ± 15.8, P = .008), F(2, 153) = 6.465, P = .002. Wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet had decreased procedural times (10 minutes, SD: 2) compared with MT (11 minutes, SD: 2) and LT (11 minutes, SD: 2), F(2, 153) = 5.732, P = .004). Trends favored WALANT over MT and LT for average operating room time (20 minutes, SD: 3 vs 32 minutes, SD: 6 vs 23 minutes, SD: 3, respectively, F(2, 153) = 101.1, P < .001), postanesthesia care unit time (12 minutes, SD: 7 vs 1:12 minutes, SD: 26 vs 20 minutes, SD: 22, respectively, F(2, 153) =171.1, P < .001), and door-to-door time (1:37 minutes, SD: 21 vs 2:51 minutes, SD: 40 vs 1:46 minutes, SD: 33, respectively, F(2, 153) = 109.3, P < .001). There were no differences in complication rates. Conclusions Our data suggest favorable trends for patients undergoing eCTR via WALANT versus MT versus LT.

Download Full-text

Development of a Low-Resource Operating Room and a Wide-Awake Orthopedic Surgery Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Surgical Innovation ◽

10.1177/15533506211003530 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 155335062110035

Author(s):

Justin J. Turcotte ◽

Jeffrey M. Gelfand ◽

Christopher M. Jones ◽

Rubie S. Jackson

Keyword(s):

Operating Room ◽

Orthopedic Surgery ◽

Physical Space ◽

Surgical Care ◽

Low Resource ◽

High Acuity ◽

Institutional Experience ◽

Provider Shortages ◽

Resource Replacement ◽

Wide Awake

Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant medication, supply and equipment, and provider shortages, limiting the resources available for provision of surgical care. In response to mandates restricting surgery to high-acuity procedures during this period, our institution developed a multidisciplinary Low-Resource Operating Room (LROR) Taskforce in April 2020. This study describes our institutional experience developing an LROR to maintain access to urgent surgical procedures during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. A delineation of available resources and resource replacement strategies was conducted, and a final institution-wide plan for operationalizing the LROR was formed. Specialty-specific subgroups then convened to determine best practices and opportunities for LROR utilization. Orthopedic surgery performed in the LROR using wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is presented as a use case. Results. Overall, 19 limited resources were identified, spanning across the domains of physical space, drugs, devices and equipment, and personnel. Based on the assessment, the decision to proceed with creation of an LROR was made. Sixteen urgent orthopedic surgeries were successfully performed using WALANT without conversion to general anesthesia. Conclusion. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a LROR was successfully designed and operationalized. The process for development of a LROR and recommended strategies for operating in a resource-constrained environment may serve as a model for other institutions and facilitate rapid implementation of this care model should the need arise in future pandemic or disaster situations.

Download Full-text

600 The Use of a Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) Technique in Foot and Ankle Procedures - A Randomised Control Trial

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab134.456 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

T M Borg ◽

M Tahir ◽

N Heidari

Keyword(s):

Spinal Anaesthesia ◽

Local Anaesthesia ◽

Randomised Control Trial ◽

P Value ◽

Foot And Ankle ◽

Post Procedure ◽

Trimalleolar Fractures ◽

Post Operative Pain ◽

Wide Awake ◽

No Tourniquet

Abstract Introduction Wide awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is a widely used technique in upper limb procedures that has gained increasing popularity during the coronavirus pandemic. The benefit of WALANT for foot and ankle surgeries is less clear, especially in patients with multiple comorbities. The primary aim of this study was to compare post-operative pain levels in patients undergoing ankle fracture fixation. Secondary objectives included comparison of intra-operative patient experiences, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction 1-year post-procedure. Method 129 patients presenting with ankle fractures were enrolled in a multicenter randomised control trial from February 2016 to January 2020. Patients with medial malleolar, lateral malleolar, bimalleolar or trimalleolar fractures received either WALANT (62 patients) or spinal anaesthesia (67 patients). A 5ml solution of 0.9% saline and 2% lidocaine with 1: 100,000 adrenaline was used for WALANT. Results Compared to patients who received spinal anaesthesia, those in the WALANT group experienced less post-operative discomfort and were more satisfied 1-year post-procedure (p-value = 0.003). Surgical outcomes were similar for both groups. Cost analysis revealed that WALANT is significantly more economical. Conclusions WALANT is an effective and safe anaesthetic for foot and ankle procedures. Without use of a tourniquet, it reduces post-operative pain and so, eases patient recovery.

Download Full-text