scholarly journals Development of a Low-Resource Operating Room and a Wide-Awake Orthopedic Surgery Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062110035
Author(s):  
Justin J. Turcotte ◽  
Jeffrey M. Gelfand ◽  
Christopher M. Jones ◽  
Rubie S. Jackson

Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant medication, supply and equipment, and provider shortages, limiting the resources available for provision of surgical care. In response to mandates restricting surgery to high-acuity procedures during this period, our institution developed a multidisciplinary Low-Resource Operating Room (LROR) Taskforce in April 2020. This study describes our institutional experience developing an LROR to maintain access to urgent surgical procedures during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. A delineation of available resources and resource replacement strategies was conducted, and a final institution-wide plan for operationalizing the LROR was formed. Specialty-specific subgroups then convened to determine best practices and opportunities for LROR utilization. Orthopedic surgery performed in the LROR using wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is presented as a use case. Results. Overall, 19 limited resources were identified, spanning across the domains of physical space, drugs, devices and equipment, and personnel. Based on the assessment, the decision to proceed with creation of an LROR was made. Sixteen urgent orthopedic surgeries were successfully performed using WALANT without conversion to general anesthesia. Conclusion. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a LROR was successfully designed and operationalized. The process for development of a LROR and recommended strategies for operating in a resource-constrained environment may serve as a model for other institutions and facilitate rapid implementation of this care model should the need arise in future pandemic or disaster situations.

Author(s):  
Deeptiman James ◽  
Faye M. Evans ◽  
Ekta Rai ◽  
Nobhojit Roy

Abstract Background Mismatched surgeon-anesthesiologist ratios often exist in low-resource settings making safe emergency essential surgical care challenging. This study is an audit of emergency essential procedures performed for lower-limb (LL) musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) when an anesthesiologist was unavailable. It aims to identify strategies for safe anesthesia. Methods A 5-year retrospective audit of emergency essential LL orthopedic procedures performed at remote mission hospital in Central India was performed. Out of necessity, a regional anesthesia (RA) protocol was developed in collaboration with anesthesiologists familiar with the setting. The incidence of intraoperative surgical and perioperative anesthesia complications when RA was administered by a surgeon was evaluated. Results During this period, 766 emergency essential LL MSDs procedures were performed. An anesthesiologist was available for only 6/766. RA was administered by a surgeon for 283/766. This included spinal anesthesia (SA) for 267/283 patients, peripheral nerve blocks for 16/283. Local infiltration and/or sedation was administered to 477/766. There were 17 intraoperative surgical complications. Anesthesia-related complications included 37/267 patients who required multiple attempts to localize subarachnoid space and SA failure in 9/267 patients all of whom had successful re-administration. Additional sedation and infiltration of local anesthetic was required in 5/267 patients. Conclusion Remote pre-anesthesia consultation for high-risk patients, local surgeon-anesthesiologist networking, protocol-guided management, and dedicated short duration of training in anesthesia may be considered as an alternative for delivering RA for emergency essential surgery for LL MSDs due to unavailability of anesthesiologists.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Colquhoun ◽  
Ryan P. Davis ◽  
Theodore T. Tremper ◽  
Jenny J. Mace ◽  
Jan M. Gombert ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Multifunction surveillance alerting systems have been found to be beneficial for the operating room and labor and delivery. This paper describes a similar system developed for in-hospital acute care environments, AlertWatch Acute Care (AWAC). Results A decision support surveillance system has been developed which extracts comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) data including live data from physiologic monitors and ventilators and incorporates them into an integrated organ icon-based patient display. Live data retrieved from the hospitals network are processed by presenting scrolling median values to reduce artifacts. A total of 48 possible alerts are generated covering a broad range of critical patient care concerns. Notification is achieved by paging or texting the appropriated member of the critical care team. Alerts range from simple out of range values to more complex programing of impending Ventilator Associated Events, SOFA, qSOFA, SIRS scores and process of care reminders for the management of glucose and sepsis. As with similar systems developed for the operating room and labor and delivery, there are green, yellow, and red configurable ranges for all parameters. A census view allows surveillance of an entire unit with flashing or text to voice alerting and enables detailed information by windowing into an individual patient view including live physiologic waveforms. The system runs via web interface on desktop as well as mobile devices, with iOS native app available, for ease of communication from any location. The goal is to improve safety and adherence to standard management protocols. Conclusions AWAC is designed to provide a high level surveillance view for multi-bed hospital units with varying acuity from standard floor patients to complex ICU care. Alerts are generated by algorithms running in the background and automatically notify the selected member of the patients care team. Its value has been demonstrated for low acuity patients, further study is required to determine its effectiveness in high acuity patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. e25-e29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magda Diab-Elschahawi ◽  
Jutta Berger ◽  
Alexander Blacky ◽  
Oliver Kimberger ◽  
Ruken Oguz ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. e000075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nakul P Raykar ◽  
Rachel R Yorlets ◽  
Charles Liu ◽  
Roberta Goldman ◽  
Sarah L M Greenberg ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierluigi Lelli Chiesa ◽  
Osman T. M. Osman ◽  
Antonio Aloi ◽  
Mariagrazia Andriani ◽  
Alberto Benigni ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 189
Author(s):  
L.C. Carlson ◽  
K.W. Hatcher ◽  
R. Ayala ◽  
W.P. Magee ◽  
R. Vander Burg

AORN Journal ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 37-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerelynn S. Bittner ◽  
Eleanor L. Freeman ◽  
James L. Talbert
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Zarei ◽  
Sara Bagheri ◽  
Amin Sedigh ◽  
Mohammad Ghasembandi

Background & Aim: A wide range of clinical education of operating room students is done in the operating room. One of the problems in students' clinical education is the lack of appropriate learning tools in the operating room. The use of educational tools that improve students' performance affects students' self-efficacy in the operating room. So, the purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the surgical preference card as an educational aid tool on the self-efficacy of the operating room students. Methods & Materials: This quasi-experimental study was carried out on 64 operating room students of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences at AL-Zahra Hospital in the year 2018. Participates were selected through convenience sampling and were divided into experimental (n=32) and control (n=32) groups. The students in the intervention group performed surgical care with using the surgical preference card. The data collection tool was a clinical self-efficacy questionnaire. Data were analyzed with SPSS-21 software using the independent-t, paired t-test, and chi-square test. Results: The findings of this study showed that there was no significant difference between the average self-efficacy score of the control group before and after the intervention (p>0.05). while the average self-efficacy score of the experimental group increased significantly after the intervention as compared with before the intervention (p <0.001). Conclusion: The surgical preference card as an educational aid tool improved the students' selfefficacy. Therefore, it is recommended to use this tool for the clinical education of other operating room students.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 429-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Rabinowitz ◽  
Thomas Kelly ◽  
Ann Peterson ◽  
Eric Angermeier ◽  
Kyle Kokko

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document