Envy and help giving.

Author(s):  
Ronit Montal-Rosenberg ◽  
Simone Moran
Keyword(s):  
1971 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-206
Author(s):  
MICHAEL J. PATTON
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Arie Nadler

This chapter reviews social psychological research on help giving and helping relations from the 1950s until today. The first section considers the conditions under which people are likely to help others, personality dispositions that characterize helpful individuals, and motivational and attributional antecedents of helpfulness. The second section looks at long-term consequences of help and examines help in the context of enduring and emotionally significant relationships. Research has shown that in the long run help can increase psychological and physical well-being for helpers but discourage self-reliance for recipients. The third section analyzes helping from intra- and intergroup perspectives, considering how its provision can contribute to helpers’ reputations within a group or promote the positive social identity of in-groups relative to out-groups. Help is thus conceptualized as a negotiation between the fundamental psychological needs for belongingness and independence. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.


Author(s):  
Ishrat Ahmed ◽  
Areej Mawasi ◽  
Shang Wang ◽  
Ruth Wylie ◽  
Yoav Bergner ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 923-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
William DeJong ◽  
Arvo J. Oopik

Residents of a small Vermont town received one of four mail solicitations from a statewide charity drive. In one condition, designed to legitimize small contributions, the recipients were reminded at the end of the written appeal that “even a penny will help.” In a second condition, the recipients were told that they, like other residents of their town, were known to be concerned about others and received a small gift to reinforce that “helper” label, a bumper sticker reading “I Help Out.” In a second labeling condition, the recipients were told they were known to be proud of their state and received a bumper sticker to reinforce that label. Those in a control condition received a customary direct mail solicitation. Analysis showed that labeling potential donors as “helpers” did not substantially increase donations. Legitimizing small contributions tended to lower contributions, although the finding was not statistically significant. Techniques that work in other contexts to increase help-giving or compliance with requests must be applied cautiously in the context of direct mail fund-raising.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document