Cognitive Style Analysis

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Riding ◽  
Eugene Sadler-Smith
Author(s):  
Nikos Tsianos ◽  
Panagiotis Germanakos ◽  
Zacharias Lekkas ◽  
Costas Mourlas

The purpose of this chapter is to experimentally explore the effect of individual differences in an adaptive educational hypermedia application. To that direction, the constructs of cognitive style (Cognitive Style Analysis) and visual working memory (visuo-spatial subsystem of Baddeley’s model) were employed as personalization parameters, thus rendering possible the provision of personalized learning environments according to users’ intrinsic characteristics. Two distinct experiments were conducted, with a total sample of 347 university students, seeking out to ground the hypothesis that matching the instructional style to learners’ preferences would increase their performance. Both experiments demonstrated that users in the personalized condition generally outperformed those that were instructed in a condition mismatched to their cognitive style or visual working memory ability.


2003 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 881-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R Peterson ◽  
Ian J Deary ◽  
Elizabeth J Austin

2005 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 451-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adhip Rawal ◽  
Robert Willson

Researchers have suggested that task performance is often dependent upon the congruence of cognitive style and task. To explore this suggestion, 44 female and 4 male undergraduates were administered the Cognitive Style Analysis, the Closure Flexibility, the Composite Gestalt Completion Test, and the Vocabulary subtest from the WAIS. Specifically, four hypotheses were tested: (1) that participants with an analytic style will perform better than those with a wholistic style on the Closure Flexibility; (2) that participants with a wholistic style will perform better than those with an analytic style on the Composite Gestalt Completion Test; (3) that participants with an intermediate style will outperform persons with an analytic style on the Composite Gestalt Completion Test; and (4) that intermediate scorers would perform better than those with a wholistic style on Closure Flexibility. Only the second hypothesis was supported, so results provide only minimal support for the effect of match or mismatch of cognitive style and task performance.


1985 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 682-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Globerson ◽  
Eliya Weinstein ◽  
Ruth Sharabany

1991 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 502-502
Author(s):  
Nora Newcombe

1992 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 610-610
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document