The interrater reliability and predictive validity of the HCR-20V3 in common workplace environments.

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Cawood
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Workplace Environments

scholarly journals The Criterion Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of an Instrument for Assessing the Nursing Intensity in Perioperative Settings

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Satu Rauta ◽  
Sanna Salanterä ◽  
Tero Vahlberg ◽  
Kristiina Junttila
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Criterion Validity ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
Patient Classification ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Perioperative Nurses ◽  
Staff Allocation

Patient classification systems generate information for staff allocation based on a patient’s care needs. This study aims to test further the instrument for assessing nursing intensity (NI) in perioperative settings. Nine operating departments from five university hospitals were involved. The perioperative nurses gathered data from patients (N=876) representing different fields of surgery. Reliability was tested by parallel classifications (n=144). Also, the users’ (n=40) opinions were surveyed. The results support the predictive validity and interrater reliability of the instrument. The nurses considered the instrument feasible to use. The patients’ low ASA class did not automatically signify low NI; however, high ASA class was more frequently associated with high intraoperative NI. Intraoperative NI indicated the length of the postanaesthesia care and the type of the follow-up unit. Parallel classifications ensured the homogenous use of the instrument. The use of the instrument is recommended.

scholarly journals Predictive validity and interrater reliability of the FACE-CARAS toolkit in a CAMHS setting

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-56
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Evans ◽  
David Young ◽  
Paul A. Tiffin
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
The Face

Warning Behaviors

2021 ◽  
pp. 45-67
Author(s):  
J. Reid Meloy ◽  
Jens Hoffmann ◽  
Lynne Bibeau ◽  
Angela Guldimann
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
The Other ◽  
Intimate Partner Homicide ◽  
Public Figure ◽  
Targeted Violence ◽  
School Shooters ◽  
Adult Mass

The typology of eight proximal warning behaviors for targeted violence was first introduced a decade ago. Since that time, a number of studies have continued to support its interrater reliability and its criterion, discriminant, and predictive validity. Among the warning behaviors, the three most validated in discriminating between attackers and nonattackers are pathway, identification, and last resort. All of the other warning behaviors—fixation, novel aggression, energy burst, leakage, and directly communicated threat—are found at various frequencies throughout all the samples tested to date, including intimate partner homicide perpetrators, school shooters, adult mass murderers, public figure attackers, and lone actor terrorists.

Interrater Reliability, Concurrent Validity, Responsiveness, and Predictive Validity of the Melville-Nelson Self-Care Assessment

2002 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Nelson ◽  
L. L. Melville ◽  
J. D. Wilkerson ◽  
R. A. Magness ◽  
J. L. Grech ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Care Assessment

scholarly journals Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane E. O’Brien ◽  
Helene M. Dumas
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Validity Testing ◽  
Complexity Index ◽  
Related Group ◽  
Rehabilitation Hospitals

The Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children (PAARC) is the first known acuity rating intended to reflect medical severity based on age, reason for admission, diagnoses, dependence in activities of daily living, and technology reliance for children admitted to post-acute care rehabilitation hospitals. Content validity was tested using an expert panel scoring the Content Validity Index (CVI). Concurrent validity was examined using clinician’s opinion of acuity at admission, the Complexity Index, and All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) codes. Predictive validity was examined with acute care readmission within 30 days. Interrater reliability was assessed using admission histories from closed cases. Content validity was established and concurrent validity was moderate to high with clinician opinion (rho = .76,p<.001), the Complexity Index (rho = .76,p<.001), and APR-DRGs (rho = .349,p=.001). Predictive validity was moderate (rho = .504,p=.005) and returns to acute care within 30 days. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.92–0.90,p<.001). Experts agreed that the PAARC’s content is relevant, simple, and representative of the population. The PAARC measured well against indicators of medical complexity for pediatric outpatient care and medical record coding and was reliable between raters. This work supports proceeding with additional development and validity testing of the PAARC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document