scholarly journals Predictive validity and interrater reliability of the FACE-CARAS toolkit in a CAMHS setting

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-56
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Evans ◽  
David Young ◽  
Paul A. Tiffin
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Satu Rauta ◽  
Sanna Salanterä ◽  
Tero Vahlberg ◽  
Kristiina Junttila

Patient classification systems generate information for staff allocation based on a patient’s care needs. This study aims to test further the instrument for assessing nursing intensity (NI) in perioperative settings. Nine operating departments from five university hospitals were involved. The perioperative nurses gathered data from patients (N=876) representing different fields of surgery. Reliability was tested by parallel classifications (n=144). Also, the users’ (n=40) opinions were surveyed. The results support the predictive validity and interrater reliability of the instrument. The nurses considered the instrument feasible to use. The patients’ low ASA class did not automatically signify low NI; however, high ASA class was more frequently associated with high intraoperative NI. Intraoperative NI indicated the length of the postanaesthesia care and the type of the follow-up unit. Parallel classifications ensured the homogenous use of the instrument. The use of the instrument is recommended.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin - walcy Waldie ◽  
Vanessa J Gillespie ◽  
Claire L Coleman ◽  
David H Cropley ◽  
Michelle L Oppert ◽  
...  

Strong and growing interest in Malevolent Creativity has created a need for valid and reliable measures of, among other things, malevolent creative ideation. The Malevolent Creativity Behavior Scale (MCBS) was created in response to weaknesses identified in earlier studies of malevolent creativity. However, concerns over the face validity of the MCBS, coupled with an increasing popularity of the scale in empirical studies, prompted an examination of the construct and concurrent (i.e. predictive) validity of the MCBS. The results of this study suggest that the MCBS has poor validity: it measures neither creative nor malevolent ideation sufficiently well to warrant its use in empirical studies of malevolent creativity. These findings caution against the uncritical use of a poorly constructed scale in malevolent creativity research, as well as the on-going need for an instrument to address this measurement gap.


Author(s):  
J. Reid Meloy ◽  
Jens Hoffmann ◽  
Lynne Bibeau ◽  
Angela Guldimann

The typology of eight proximal warning behaviors for targeted violence was first introduced a decade ago. Since that time, a number of studies have continued to support its interrater reliability and its criterion, discriminant, and predictive validity. Among the warning behaviors, the three most validated in discriminating between attackers and nonattackers are pathway, identification, and last resort. All of the other warning behaviors—fixation, novel aggression, energy burst, leakage, and directly communicated threat—are found at various frequencies throughout all the samples tested to date, including intimate partner homicide perpetrators, school shooters, adult mass murderers, public figure attackers, and lone actor terrorists.


2002 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Nelson ◽  
L. L. Melville ◽  
J. D. Wilkerson ◽  
R. A. Magness ◽  
J. L. Grech ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document