Autogeny in saltmarsh mosquitoes induced by a substance from the male accessory gland

Nature ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 267 (5609) ◽  
pp. 342-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
GEORGE F. O'MEARA ◽  
DAVID G. EVANS
Andrology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandro La Vignera ◽  
Andrea Crafa ◽  
Rosita A. Condorelli ◽  
Federica Barbagallo ◽  
Laura M. Mongioì ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sander van Iersel ◽  
Elferra M. Swart ◽  
Yumi Nakadera ◽  
Nico M. van Straalen ◽  
Joris M. Koene

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. R196-R197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrett P. League ◽  
Lindsay L. Baxter ◽  
Mariana F. Wolfner ◽  
Laura C. Harrington

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaya Kumari ◽  
Pradip Sinha

AbstractConservation of developmental genetic toolkits of functionally comparable organs from disparate phyla reveals their deep homology, which may help overcome the challenges of their confounding categorization as either homologous or analogous organs. A male accessory sexual organ in mammals, prostate, for instance, is anatomically disparate from its phylogenetically distant counterpart—the male accessory gland (MAG)—in insects likeDrosophila. By examining a select set of toolkit gene expression patterns, here we show thatDrosophilaMAG displays deep homology with the mammalian prostate. Like mammalian prostate, MAG morphogenesis is marked by recruitment of fibroblast growth factor receptor, FGFR, a tubulogenesis toolkit signaling pathway, starting early during its adepithelial genesis. Specialization of the individual domains of the developing MAG tube on the other hand is marked by expression of a posterior Hox gene transcription factor, Abd-B, while Hh-Dpp signaling marks its growth.DrosophilaMAG thus reveals developmental design of unitary bud-derived tube—a ground plan that appears to have been reiteratively co-opted during evolutionary diversification of male accessory sexual organs across distant phylogeny.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document