scholarly journals Deregulated Type I IFN Response in TREX1-Associated Familial Chilblain Lupus

2014 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 1456-1459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Peschke ◽  
Franziska Friebe ◽  
Nick Zimmermann ◽  
Tom Wahlicht ◽  
Tina Schumann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifn ◽  
Familial Chilblain Lupus ◽  
Chilblain Lupus

Familial chilblain lupus due to a gain-of-function mutation in STING

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 468-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadja König ◽  
Christoph Fiehn ◽  
Christine Wolf ◽  
Max Schuster ◽  
Emanuel Cura Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Homology Modelling ◽  
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Heterozygous Mutation ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifn ◽  
Gain Of Function ◽  
Familial Chilblain Lupus ◽  
Chilblain Lupus

ObjectivesFamilial chilblain lupus is a monogenic form of cutaneous lupus erythematosus caused by loss-of-function mutations in the nucleases TREX1 or SAMHD1. In a family without TREX1 or SAMHD1 mutation, we sought to determine the causative gene and the underlying disease pathology.MethodsExome sequencing was used for disease gene identification. Structural analysis was performed by homology modelling and docking simulations. Type I interferon (IFN) activation was assessed in cells transfected with STING cDNA using an IFN-β reporter and Western blotting. IFN signatures in patient blood in response to tofacitinib treatment were measured by RT-PCR of IFN-stimulated genes.ResultsIn a multigenerational family with five members affected with chilblain lupus, we identified a heterozygous mutation of STING, a signalling molecule in the cytosolic DNA sensing pathway. Structural and functional analyses indicate that mutant STING enhances homodimerisation in the absence of its ligand cGAMP resulting in constitutive type I IFN activation. Treatment of two affected family members with the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor tofacitinib led to a marked suppression of the IFN signature.ConclusionsA heterozygous gain-of-function mutation in STING can cause familial chilblain lupus. These findings expand the genetic spectrum of type I IFN-dependent disorders and suggest that JAK inhibition may be of therapeutic value.

PLASMACYTOID DENDRITIC CELLS FUNCTION IN HIV INFECTION

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Martin Hyrcza ◽  
Mario Ostrowski ◽  
Sandy Der
Keyword(s):  
Dendritic Cells ◽  
Influenza Virus ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Gene Transcription ◽  
Sendai Virus ◽  
Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Interferon Response ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifn

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are innate immune cells able to produce large quantities of type I interferons (IFN) when activated. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients show generalized immune dysfunction characterized in part by chronic interferon response. In this study we investigated the role of dendritic cells inactivating and maintaining this response. Specifically we compared the IFN geneactivity in pDCs in response to several viruses and TLR agonists. We hypothesized that 1) the pattern of IFN gene transcription would differ in pDCs treated with HIV than with other agents, and 2) that pDCs from patients from different stages of disease would respond differently to the stimulations. To test these hypotheses, we obtained pDCs from 15 HIV-infected and uninfected individuals and treated freshly isolated pDCs with either HIV (BAL strain), influenza virus (A/PR/8/34), Sendai virus (Cantell strain), TLR7 agonist(imiquimod), or TLR9 agonist (CpG-ODN) for 6h. Type I IFN gene transcription was monitored by real time qPCRfor IFNA1, A2, A5, A6, A8,A17, B1, and E1, and cytokine levels were assayed by Cytometric Bead Arrays forTNF?, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL1?, and IL12p70. pDC function as determined by these two assays showed no difference between HIV-infected and uninfected patients or between patients with early or chronic infection. Specifically, HIV did notinduce type I IFN gene expression, whereas influenza virus, Sendai virus and imiquimod did. Similarly, HIV failed to induce any cytokine release from pDCs in contrast to influenza virus, Sendai virus and imiquimod, which stimulatedrelease of TNF?, IL6, or IL8. Together these results suggest that the reaction of pDCs to HIV virus is quantitatively different from the response to agents such as virus, Sendai virus, and imiquimod. In addition, pDCs from HIV-infected persons have responses similar to pDCs from uninfected donors, suggesting, that the DC function may not be affected by HIV infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document