scholarly journals Tips for oral medicine in primary care

BDJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 231 (12) ◽  
pp. 730-731
Author(s):  
Mike Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
VINICIUS COELHO CARRARD ◽  
MICHELLE ROXO GONÇALVES ◽  
JÉSSICA RODRIGUEZ STREY ◽  
CARLOS PILZ ◽  
MARCELO RODRIGUES GONÇALVES ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 435-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassius Torres-Pereira ◽  
Renata Seleme Possebon ◽  
André Simões ◽  
Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi ◽  
Jair Carneiro Leão ◽  
...  

We examined the feasibility of distance diagnosis of oral diseases, using transmission of digital images by email. Twenty-five cases of oral lesions were documented during a 12-month study in a primary care public health clinic in Paraná in Southern Brazil. Clinical electronic charts and images were produced and sent by email to two oral medicine specialists with a median of 10 years experience in the field. The consultants provided a maximum of two clinical hypotheses for each case. In 15 of the 25 cases (60%) both consultants made a correct diagnosis; in seven cases (28%) only one consultant made a correct diagnosis; and in three cases (12%) neither consultant made a correct diagnosis. Thus in 88% of cases, at least one consultant was able to provide the correct diagnosis. The results suggest that distant diagnosis can be an effective alternative in the diagnosis of oral lesions and that the using two distant consultants improves diagnostic accuracy. Primary care public health clinics may benefit from the use of email and digital cameras for telehealth in remote areas where oral medicine specialists are not available.


Author(s):  
Jéssica Rodriguez Strey ◽  
Michelle Roxo Gonçalves ◽  
Bianca Dutra Guzenski ◽  
Marco Antonio Trevizani Martins ◽  
Juliana Romanini ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-524
Author(s):  
Brent Pollitt

Mental illness is a serious problem in the United States. Based on “current epidemiological estimates, at least one in five people has a diagnosable mental disorder during the course of a year.” Fortunately, many of these disorders respond positively to psychotropic medications. While psychiatrists write some of the prescriptions for psychotropic medications, primary care physicians write more of them. State legislatures, seeking to expand patient access to pharmacological treatment, granted physician assistants and nurse practitioners prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications. Over the past decade other groups have gained some form of prescriptive authority. Currently, psychologists comprise the primary group seeking prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications.The American Society for the Advancement of Pharmacotherapy (“ASAP”), a division of the American Psychological Association (“APA”), spearheads the drive for psychologists to gain prescriptive authority. The American Psychological Association offers five main reasons why legislatures should grant psychologists this privilege: 1) psychologists’ education and clinical training better qualify them to diagnose and treat mental illness in comparison with primary care physicians; 2) the Department of Defense Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project (“PDP”) demonstrated non-physician psychologists can prescribe psychotropic medications safely; 3) the recommended post-doctoral training requirements adequately prepare psychologists to prescribe safely psychotropic medications; 4) this privilege will increase availability of mental healthcare services, especially in rural areas; and 5) this privilege will result in an overall reduction in medical expenses, because patients will visit only one healthcare provider instead of two–one for psychotherapy and one for medication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document