scholarly journals National external quality assessment for next-generation sequencing-based diagnostics of primary immunodeficiencies

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-28
Author(s):  
Kim Elsink ◽  
Manon M. H. Huibers ◽  
Iris H. I. M. Hollink ◽  
Lars T. van der Veken ◽  
Robert F. Ernst ◽  
...  
Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hezhao Ji ◽  
Neil Parkin ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
Thomas Denny ◽  
Cheryl Jennings ◽  
...  

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is likely to become the new standard method for HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) genotyping. Despite the significant advances in the development of wet-lab protocols and bioinformatic data processing pipelines, one often-missing critical component of an NGS HIVDR assay for clinical use is external quality assessment (EQA). EQA is essential for ensuring assay consistency and laboratory competency in performing routine biomedical assays, and the rollout of NGS HIVDR tests in clinical practice will require an EQA. In September 2019, the 2nd International Symposium on NGS HIVDR was held in Winnipeg, Canada. It convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts, including research scientists, clinicians, bioinformaticians, laboratory biologists, biostatisticians, and EQA experts. A themed discussion was conducted on EQA strategies towards such assays during the symposium. This article describes the logistical challenges identified and summarizes the opinions and recommendations derived from these discussions, which may inform the development of an inaugural EQA program for NGS HIVDR in the near future.


Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma R. Lee ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
Paul Sandstrom ◽  
Hezhao Ji

Over the past decade, there has been an increase in the adoption of next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies for HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) testing. NGS far outweighs conventional Sanger sequencing as it has much higher throughput, lower cost when samples are batched and, most importantly, significantly higher sensitivities for variants present at low frequencies, which may have significant clinical implications. Despite the advantages of NGS, Sanger sequencing remains the gold standard for HIVDR testing, largely due to the lack of standardization of NGS-based HIVDR testing. One important aspect of standardization includes external quality assessment (EQA) strategies and programs. Current EQA for Sanger-based HIVDR testing includes proficiency testing where samples are sent to labs and the performance of the lab conducting such assays is evaluated. The current methods for Sanger-based EQA may not apply to NGS-based tests because of the fundamental differences in their technologies and outputs. Sanger-based genotyping reports drug resistance mutations (DRMs) data as dichotomous, whereas NGS-based HIVDR genotyping also reports DRMs as numerical data (percent abundance). Here we present an overview of the need to develop EQA for NGS-based HIVDR testing and some unique challenges that may be encountered.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4936-4936
Author(s):  
Noemi Roy ◽  
Melanie Proven ◽  
Irene Roberts ◽  
Hannah Tamary ◽  
Dorine W. Swinkels ◽  
...  

Abstract The diagnosis of patients with inherited anemias is increasingly made in conjunction with high-throughput 'next-generation' sequencing (NGS) analysis, largely using targeted resequencing panels validated for clinical use in diagnostic labs. While there is a joint UK NEQAS and European Molecular Quality Network pilot scheme for Molecular Genetics to assess NGS quality control, this is not disease-specific. Patients with inherited anaemias can have multiple mutations with complex genotype phenotype interactions therefore a scheme assessing interpretation of these results could be of value. Likewise, guidelines for variant reporting (eg ACMG- American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics) provide excellent advice on how to interpret the likely pathogenicity of genetic variants, but no disease-specific guidance exists to assist in the clinical interpretation of NGS findings for individuals with rare inherited anemias. The European Hematology Association Scientific Working Group on Red Cells and Iron carried out a survey among its members to investigate variability in current practice and determine the need for, and feasibility of, a formal external quality assessment (EQA) scheme. Surveys and two clinical vignettes with sample variant call files (VCFs) were distributed among 14 participating labs from 9 countries; 13/14 labs used a targeted panel and 1/14 lab (8%) used a 366-gene virtual panel derived from whole exome sequencing data. Accreditation: 12/14 labs had ISO (International Organisation for Standardisation) accreditation for their NGS; 2/12,used local accreditation schemes. The number of genes per targeted panel ranged from 18 to 215 genes (median 64), covering: congenital dyserythropoietic anemias, Diamond-Blackfan anemia, sideroblastic anemia, red cell membrane and enzyme disorders. Some panels included other related bone marrow failure or iron metabolism disorders. 7/13 labs with targeted panels sequenced only exons, with variable padding into introns, while 6/13 routinely sequenced 3' and 5' untranslated regions. Capture methods were variable between labs and 11/14 labs used Illumina platforms for sequencing and 3/14 Ion Torrent. Sanger sequencing was used for confirmation of NGS variants in 12/14 labs, but used for gap-filling of uncovered regions in 10/14 labs. Reporting of variants followed ACMG guidelines in 10/14 labs, ACGS (Association for Clinical Genomics Science) guidelines in 2/14 and no published guidelines in 2/14. Reporting of Tier 3 (variants of uncertain significance): 8/14 labs reported strict adherence to ACMG guidelines, including only Class 4 and Class 5 variants in clinical reports, while 6/14 labs admitted looser adherence and reporting of Class 3 variants depending on circumstances. The number of samples analysed per year was highly variable between labs (10-600, median 60). Two mini-EQA VCFs were sent with clinical vignettes, for which 100% of labs correctly identified a case of autosomal recessive sideroblastic anaemia due to compound heterozygous mutations in SLC25A38, and 100% correctly identified a case negative by NGS. Class 3 variants were not reported at all in 50% of clinical reports, reported in the main body of the report in 20% and in a separate table in 30% of labs. In conclusion, we have identified common approaches to NGS sequencing in 14 diagnostic laboratories but highlighted variability in accreditation, use of Sanger sequencing and adherence to ACMG guidelines. The feasibility of carrying out an EQA scheme has been established and work will continue with UK NEQAS to formally create such a scheme, with the aim of ensuring improved patient care through the use of objective quality assessments. Disclosures Colombatti: ADDMEDICA: Consultancy; BlueBirdBio: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy; NOVARTIS: Consultancy. Viprakasit:Protagonist Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Noguera-Julian ◽  
Emma R. Lee ◽  
Robert W. Shafer ◽  
Rami Kantor ◽  
Hezhao Ji

External quality assessment (EQA) is a keystone element in the validation and implementation of next generation sequencing (NGS)-based HIV drug resistance testing (DRT). Software validation and evaluation is a critical element in NGS EQA programs. While the development, sharing, and adoption of wet lab protocols is coupled with the increasing access to NGS technology worldwide, rendering it easy to produce NGS data for HIV-DRT, bioinformatic data analysis remains a bottleneck for most of the diagnostic laboratories. Several computational tools have been made available, via free or commercial sources, to automate the conversion of raw NGS data into an actionable clinical report. Although different software platforms yield equivalent results when identical raw NGS datasets are analyzed for variations at higher abundance, discrepancies arise when variations at lower frequencies are considered. This implies that validation and performance assessment of the bioinformatics tools applied in NGS HIV-DRT is critical, and the origins of the observed discrepancies should be determined. Well-characterized reference NGS datasets with ground truth on the genotype composition at all examined loci and the exact frequencies of HIV variations they may harbor, so-called dry panels, would be essential in such cases. The strategic design and construction of such panels are challenging but imperative tasks in support of EQA programs for NGS-based HIV-DRT and the validation of relevant bioinformatics tools. Here, we present criteria that can guide the design of such dry panels, which were discussed in the Second International Winnipeg Symposium themed for EQA strategies for NGS HIVDR assays.


2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 238-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tongwu Zhang ◽  
Yingfeng Luo ◽  
Kan Liu ◽  
Linlin Pan ◽  
Bing Zhang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (49) ◽  
pp. 2095-2112
Author(s):  
Melinda Erdős

Abstract: Next generation sequencing methods represent the latest era of molecular genetic diagnostics. After a general introduction on primary immunodeficiencies, the author summarizes the importance of molecular genetic studies, especially next generation sequencing in the diagnosis of primary immunodeficiencies. Another purpose of the manuscript is to give a brief summary on the methodological basis of next generation sequencing. The author analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of primary immunodeficiency gene-panel sequencing and whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing. Primary immunodeficiency genes and diseases recognized by next generation sequencing is also summarized. Finally, the author emphasizes the indispensability of gene level diagnostics in primary immunodeficiencies and presents the results achieved in this field in Hungary. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(49): 2095–2112.


Author(s):  
Arun Kumar Arunachalam ◽  
Madhavi Maddali ◽  
Fouzia N. Aboobacker ◽  
Anu Korula ◽  
Biju George ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document