scholarly journals A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change

Author(s):  
Lea Berrang-Ford ◽  
A. R. Siders ◽  
Alexandra Lesnikowski ◽  
Alexandra Paige Fischer ◽  
Max W. Callaghan ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea Berrang-Ford ◽  
A.R. Siders ◽  
Alexandra Lesnikowski ◽  
Alexandra Paige Fischer ◽  
Max Callaghan ◽  
...  

Abstract We present the first systematic, global stocktake of the academic literature on human adaptation. We screen 48,316 documents and identify 1,682 articles that present empirical research documenting human efforts to reduce risk from climate change and associated hazards. Coding and synthesizing this literature highlights that the overall extent of adaptation across global regions and sectors is low. Adaptations are largely local and incremental rather than transformative. Behavioural adjustments by individuals and households are more prevalent than any other type of response, largely motivated by drought and precipitation variability. Local governments and civil society are engaging in risk reduction across all sectors and regions, particularly in response to flooding. Urban technological and infrastructural adaptations to flood risk are prevalent in Europe, while shifts in farming practices dominate reporting from Africa and Asia. Despite increasing evidence of adaptation responses, evidence that these responses are reducing risks (observed and projected) remains limited.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 3280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tristan Pearce ◽  
Evelyn Rodríguez ◽  
David Fawcett ◽  
James Ford

We develop and apply a systematic literature review methodology to identify and characterize the ways in which the peer-reviewed literature depicts how climate change adaptation is occurring in Australia. We reviewed the peer-reviewed, English-language literature between January 2005 and January 2018 for examples of documented human adaptation initiatives in Australia. Our results challenge previous assumptions that adaptation actions are not happening in Australia and describes adaptation processes that are underway. For the most part, actions can be described as preliminary or groundwork, with a particular focus on documenting stakeholder perspectives on climate change and attitudes towards adaptation, and modelling or scenario planning in the coastal zone, agriculture, and health sectors. Where concrete adaptations are reported, they are usually in the agricultural sector and are most common in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia’s food basket. The findings of the review advance our understanding of adaptation to climate change as a process and the need to consider different stages in the process when tracking adaptation.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Pisor ◽  
James Holland Jones

OBJECTIVES. Despite our focus on adaptation and human responses to climate, evolutionary and biological anthropologists (EBAs) are largely absent from conversations about contemporary “climate-change adaptation,” a term popular in other disciplines, the development world, and related policy decisions. EBAs are missing a big opportunity to contribute to impactful, time-sensitive applied work: we have extensive theoretical and empirical knowledge pertinent to conversations about climate-change adaptation and to helping support communities as they cope. This special issue takes a tour of EBA contributions to our understanding of climate-change adaptation, from data on past and contemporary human communities to theoretically informed predictions about how individuals and communities will respond to climate change now and in the future. First, however, we must establish what we mean by “climate change” and “adaptation,” along with other terms commonly used by EBAs; review what EBAs know about adaptation and about human responses to climate change; and identify just a few topics EBAs study that are pertinent to ongoing conversations about climate-change adaptation. In this article, we do just that. CONCLUSION. From our work on energy use to our work on demography, subsistence, social networks, and the salience of climate change to local communities, EBAs have an abundance of data and theoretical insights to help inform responses to contemporary climate change. We need to better reach the climate community and general public with our contributions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Åkesson ◽  
Frazer Matthews-Bird ◽  
Madeleine Bitting ◽  
Christie-Jane Fennell ◽  
Warren B. Church ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. e429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel W. Beebe ◽  
Robert D. Cooper ◽  
Pipi Mottram ◽  
Anthony W. Sweeney

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document