Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance

Author(s):  
James L. Liu ◽  
Hiten D. Patel ◽  
Nora M. Haney ◽  
Jonathan I. Epstein ◽  
Alan W. Partin
2013 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. E234-E242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Firas Abdollah ◽  
Nazareno Suardi ◽  
Umberto Capitanio ◽  
Andrea Gallina ◽  
Maxine Sun ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 189 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Porpiglia ◽  
Cristian Fiori ◽  
Fabrizio Mele ◽  
Matteo Manfredi ◽  
Susanna Grande ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 619-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Carlsen Elkjær ◽  
Morten Heebøll Andersen ◽  
Søren Høyer ◽  
Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen ◽  
Michael Borre

Background Active surveillance (AS) of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is an accepted alternative to active treatment. However, the conventional diagnostic trans-rectal ultrasound guided biopsies (TRUS-bx) underestimate PCa aggressiveness in almost half of the cases, when compared with the surgical specimen. Purpose To investigate if additional multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate and MRI-guided in-bore biopsies (MRGB) at AS inclusion would improve selection of patients for active treatment. Material and Methods All patients enrolled in AS programs at two Danish centers, from October 2014 to January 2016, were offered an mpMRI 8–12 weeks after the initial diagnostic TRUS-bx. Candidates had low-risk disease (PSA < 10 ng/mL, <cT2b, Gleason score [GS] < 7). Prostate lesions were scored on the five-point PIRADS scale (version 1 and 2). MRGB were performed on PIRADS 4 or 5 lesions. Significant cancer was defined as GS > 6 or GS 6 (3 + 3) lesions with ≥ 6 mm maximal cancer core length (MCCL). Results A total of 78 patients were included and in 21 patients a total of 22 PIRADS-score 4 or 5 lesions were detected. MRGB pathology revealed that 17 (81%) of these and 22% of the entire AS population harbored significant cancers at AS inclusion. In eight (38%) cases, the GS was upgraded. Also, nine patients (43%) had GS 6 (3 + 3) foci with MCCL ≥ 6 mm. Conclusion In an AS cohort based on TRUS and TRUS-bx diagnostic strategies, supplemental mpMRI and in-bore MRGB were able to efficiently reclassify a substantial number of patients as candidates for immediate active treatment.


Urology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 837-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Müller ◽  
Gernot Bonkat ◽  
Malte Rieken ◽  
Stephen F. Wyler ◽  
Lukas Bubendorf ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. S127-S128
Author(s):  
R. Giulianelli ◽  
L. Albanesi ◽  
F. Attisani ◽  
S. Brunori ◽  
B. Gentile ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Toren ◽  
Lih-Ming Wong ◽  
Narhari Timilshina ◽  
Shabbir Alibhai ◽  
John Trachtenberg ◽  
...  

Introduction: The use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer is controversial. Some consider it an unreliable marker and others as sufficient evidence to exclude patients from AS. We analyzed our cohort of AS patients with a PSA over 10 ng/mL.Methods: We included patients who had clinical T1c–T2a Gleason ≤6 disease, and ≤3 positive cores with ≤50% core involvement at diagnostic biopsy and ≥2 total biopsies. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) those with baseline PSA >10 ng/mL, (2) those with a PSA rise >10 ng/mL during follow-up; and (3) those with a PSA <10 ng/mL throughout AS. Adverse histology was defined as biopsy parameters exceeding the entry criteria limits. We further compared this cohort to a concurrent institutional cohort with equal biopsy parameters treated with immediate radical prostatectomy.Results: Our cohort included 698 patients with a median follow-up of 46.2 months. In total, 82 patients had a baseline PSA >10 ng/mL and 157 had a PSA rise >10 ng/mL during surveillance. No difference in adverse histology incidence was detected between groups (p = 0.3). Patients with a PSA greater than 10 were older and had higher prostate volumes. Hazard ratios for groups with a PSA >10 were protective against adverse histology. Larger prostate volume and minimal core involvement appear as factors related to this successful selection of patients to be treated with AS.Conclusion: These results suggest that a strict cut-off PSA value for all AS patients is unwarranted and may result in overtreatment. Though lacking long-term data and validation, AS appears safe in select patients with a PSA >10 ng/mL and low volume Gleason 6 disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document