scholarly journals Optical performance of progressive addition lenses (PALs) with astigmatic prescription

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. De Lestrange-Anginieur ◽  
C. S. Kee

AbstractThe progressive addition lens (PAL) is a spectacle lens design with progressive refractive power changes across the lens surface to provide sharp vision at different viewing distances for patients with reduced accommodative strength. It has gained in popularity not just for presbyopic patients, but also patients with occupational (office, driving, or digital device) and therapeutic (e.g., myopia control) needs. However, despite the increasing prevalence of astigmatism in adults > 40 years old who rely on PAL correction, no metric is available to reflect the optical variation in PALs with astigmatic prescriptions. Based on recent studies, four novel optical metrics sensitive to variation of refractive power across the lens surface of PALs have been developed. These metrics were used to compare the optical performance of PALs of various prescriptions, designs, and manufacturers. For each lens, the refractive power profile was first measured with a Moire-deflectometry-based instrument.The data was then exported and analyzed using a two-dimensional error map for each of the four metrics. The results revealed significant impacts of astigmatic prescription, providing evidence for the usefulness of these metrics in quantifying the optical performance of PALs for patients with astigmatic prescriptions.

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (9) ◽  
pp. 922001-922001
Author(s):  
高健东 Jian-dong GAO ◽  
项华中 Hua-zhong XIANG ◽  
李念宁 Nian-ning LI ◽  
王成 Cheng WANG ◽  
郑刚 Gang ZHENG ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Jiang ◽  
Xiaopeng Huang ◽  
Houxue Xia ◽  
Bingqi Wang ◽  
Fan Lu ◽  
...  

PurposeTo determine if the spatial distribution of the relative corneal refractive power shift (RCRPS) explains the retardation of axial length (AL) elongation after treatment by either orthokeratology (OK) or multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs).MethodsChildren (8–14 years) were enrolled in the OK (n = 35) or MFCL (n = 36) groups. RCRPS maps were derived by computing the difference between baseline and 12-month corneal topography maps and then subtracting the apex values. Values at the same radius were averaged to obtain the RCRPS profile, from which four parameters were extracted: (1) Half_x and (2) Half_y, i.e., the x- and y-coordinates where each profile first reached the half peak; (3) Sum4 and (4) Sum7, i.e., the summation of powers within a corneal area of 4- and 7-mm diameters. Correlations between AL elongation and these parameters were analyzed by multiple linear regression.ResultsAL elongation in the OK group was significantly smaller than that in the MFCL group (p = 0.040). Half_x and Half_y were also smaller in the OK group than the MFCL group (p < 0.001 each). Half_x was correlated with AL elongation in the OK group (p = 0.005), but not in the MFCL group (p = 0.600). In an analysis that combined eyes of both groups, Half_x was correlated with AL elongation (β = 0.161, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe OK-induced AL elongation and associated RCRPS Half_x were smaller than for the MFCL. Contact lenses that induce RCRPS closer to the corneal center may exert better myopia control.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
NUR ARESYA AHMAD NAJMEE

The number of presbyopia is increasing worldwide with highly reported on an inadequate correction which can reduce the visual satisfaction. A survey was conducted to study the level of vision satisfaction between the quality of vision and symptoms reported by progressive addition lens (PALs). Sixty questionnaires were mailed to the (PALs) wearers aged between 40 years and above from Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) Vision Care. The strongest correlation was found between the quality of vision at intermediate viewing with total satisfaction on seeing grocery shelves and computer screen with p<0.001. PALs wearers’ priority and needs should be considered in selecting the appropriate lens design to be matched for required tasks. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-102
Author(s):  
Byeong-Yeon Moon ◽  
Dong-Sik Yu ◽  
Sang-Yeob Kim ◽  
Hyun Gug Cho

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 1091
Author(s):  
Yu-Shan Chang ◽  
Long Hsu ◽  
Kuang-Lung Huang

Author(s):  
Masato SHIBUYA ◽  
Kouichi AOYAGI ◽  
Suezou NAKADATE ◽  
Hiroki ONO

2010 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-109
Author(s):  
Yu Cui ◽  
David Wilson ◽  
Tim Thurn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document