Free energies underlying ion binding and transport in protein channels: free energy perturbation simulations of ion binding and selectivity for valinomycin

1991 ◽  
Vol 87 (13) ◽  
pp. 2099 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Eisenman ◽  
Johan Aqvist ◽  
Osvaldo Alvarez
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Free Energy Perturbation ◽  
Ion Binding ◽  
Free Energies ◽  
Energy Perturbation ◽  
Protein Channels

scholarly journals Alchemical Free Energy Estimators and Molecular Dynamics Engines: Accuracy, Precision and Reproducibility

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Wade ◽  
Agastya Bhati ◽  
Shunzhou Wan ◽  
Peter Coveney
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Dynamics ◽  
Free Energy ◽  
Binding Free Energy ◽  
Thermodynamic Integration ◽  
Free Energy Perturbation ◽  
Free Energies ◽  
Ensemble Averaging ◽  
Relative Binding ◽  
Energy Perturbation ◽  
Binding Free Energies

The binding free energy between a ligand and its target protein is an essential quantity to know at all stages of the drug discovery pipeline. Assessing this value computationally can offer insight into where efforts should be focused in the pursuit of effective therapeutics to treat myriad diseases. In this work we examine the computation of alchemical relative binding free energies with an eye to assessing reproducibility across popular molecular dynamics packages and free energy estimators. The focus of this work is on 54 ligand transformations from a diverse set of protein targets: MCL1, PTP1B, TYK2, CDK2 and thrombin. These targets are studied with three popular molecular dynamics packages: OpenMM, NAMD2 and NAMD3. Trajectories collected with these packages are used to compare relative binding free energies calculated with thermodynamic integration and free energy perturbation methods. The resulting binding free energies show good agreement between molecular dynamics packages with an average mean unsigned error between packages of 0.5 $kcal/mol$ The correlation between packages is very good with the lowest Spearman's, Pearson's and Kendall's tau correlation coefficient between two packages being 0.91, 0.89 and 0.74 respectively. Agreement between thermodynamic integration and free energy perturbation is shown to be very good when using ensemble averaging.

scholarly journals Accurate absolute free energies for ligand–protein binding based on non-equilibrium approaches

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vytautas Gapsys ◽  
Ahmet Yildirim ◽  
Matteo Aldeghi ◽  
Yuriy Khalak ◽  
David van der Spoel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
First Principles ◽  
Binding Free Energy ◽  
Free Energy Perturbation ◽  
Free Energies ◽  
Hamiltonian Replica Exchange ◽  
Current State ◽  
Energy Perturbation ◽  
Binding Free Energies ◽  
Non Equilibrium

AbstractThe accurate calculation of the binding free energy for arbitrary ligand–protein pairs is a considerable challenge in computer-aided drug discovery. Recently, it has been demonstrated that current state-of-the-art molecular dynamics (MD) based methods are capable of making highly accurate predictions. Conventional MD-based approaches rely on the first principles of statistical mechanics and assume equilibrium sampling of the phase space. In the current work we demonstrate that accurate absolute binding free energies (ABFE) can also be obtained via theoretically rigorous non-equilibrium approaches. Our investigation of ligands binding to bromodomains and T4 lysozyme reveals that both equilibrium and non-equilibrium approaches converge to the same results. The non-equilibrium approach achieves the same level of accuracy and convergence as an equilibrium free energy perturbation (FEP) method enhanced by Hamiltonian replica exchange. We also compare uni- and bi-directional non-equilibrium approaches and demonstrate that considering the work distributions from both forward and reverse directions provides substantial accuracy gains. In summary, non-equilibrium ABFE calculations are shown to yield reliable and well-converged estimates of protein–ligand binding affinity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document