scholarly journals Pouch perineal rectosigmoidectomy gives better functional results than conventional rectosigmoidectomy in elderly patients with rectal prolapse

1998 ◽  
Vol 85 (11) ◽  
pp. 1525-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshioka ◽  
Ogunbiyi ◽  
Keighley
2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 2699-2702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Hyun Lee ◽  
Paryush Lakhtaria ◽  
Jorge Canedo ◽  
Yoon-Suk Lee ◽  
Steven D. Wexner

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1065-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Alwahid ◽  
S. R. Knight ◽  
H. Wadhawan ◽  
K. L. Campbell ◽  
D. Ziyaie ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rectal prolapse is a disease presentation with a prevalence of about 1%, mainly affecting older women. It usually presents with symptoms of rectal mass, rectal bleeding, fecal incontinence or constipation, with patients frequently feeling socially isolated as a result. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy is associated with lesser morbidity and mortality than the abdominal procedure, but with a much higher recurrence rate. Therefore, this technique is mainly suitable for the frail elderly patient. Specific outcomes in an elderly population have been described in only a few studies. We evaluated the morbidity, mortality, recurrence rate and functional results after this procedure related to age. Methods All patients who underwent a perineal rectosigmoidectomy over a 10-year period in two tertiary referral centers were included in the study. American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) grade, pre- and postoperative symptoms, pathology-reported post-fixation specimen length, length of in-patient stay, 30-day morbidity/mortality, and recurrence were measured. Results A total of 45 patients underwent a perineal rectosigmoidectomy. Forty-three (95%) were female, with a median age of 82.0 years (IQR 70.5–86.5), ASA grade III and median follow-up of 20 months (range 8.5–45.5 months). Half of the cohort was over 80 years old. Significant symptomatic relief was achieved, predominantly the resolution of rectal mass (8.9% vs. 60.0% preoperatively), fecal incontinence (15.6% vs. 46.7%) and constipation (4.4% vs. 26.7%). The median length of stay was 6 days, while morbidity occurred in 14 patients (31.1%) and recurrence occurred in 6 patients (13%). There were no deaths within 30 days of the procedure and outcomes were comparable in the < 80 and ≥ 80 age group. Conclusions Perineal rectosigmoidectomy is safe for older patients with greater comorbidities resulting in good functional results and is associated with low morbidity and mortality.


1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 655-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petri T. Aitola ◽  
Kari-Matti Hiltunen ◽  
Martti J. Matikainen

2004 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 168-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Walter Sobrado ◽  
Desidério Roberto Kiss ◽  
Sérgio C. Nahas ◽  
Sérgio E. A. Araújo ◽  
Victor E. Seid ◽  
...  

The "best" surgical technique for the management of complete rectal prolapse remains unknown. Due to its low incidence, it is very difficult to achieve a representative number of cases, and there are no large prospective randomized trials to attest to the superiority of one operation over another. PURPOSE: Analyze the results of surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse during 1980 and 2002. METHOD: Retrospective study. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent surgical treatment during this period. The mean age was 56.7 years, with 39 females. Besides the prolapse itself, 33 patients complained of mucous discharge, 31 of fecal incontinence, 14 of constipation, 17 of rectal bleeding, and 3 of urinary incontinence. Abdominal operations were performed in 36 (71%) cases. Presacral rectopexy was the most common abdominal procedure (29 cases) followed by presacral rectopexy associated with sigmoidectomy (5 cases). The most common perineal procedure was perineal rectosigmoidectomy associated with levatorplasty (12 cases). Intraoperative bleeding from the presacral space developed in 2 cases, and a rectovaginal fistula occurred in another patient after a perineal rectosigmoidectomy. There were 2 recurrences after a mean follow-up of 49 months, which were treated by reoperation. CONCLUSION: Abdominal and perineal procedures can be used to manage complete rectal prolapse with safety and good long-term results. Age, associated medical conditions, and symptoms of fecal incontinence or constipation are the main features that one should bear in mind in order to choose the best surgical approach.


2014 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 64-66
Author(s):  
Alpha Oumar Toure ◽  
Cheikh Tidiane Diop ◽  
Fode Baba Toure ◽  
Thomas Marcel M. Wade ◽  
Gabriel Ngom

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Sylvain Marcheix ◽  
Isaline Bazin ◽  
Guillaume Vergnenegre ◽  
Christian Mabit ◽  
Jean-Louis Charissoux

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document