Efficacy and safety of prone positioning for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

2000 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 922-929
Author(s):  
Anna N. Breiburg ◽  
Leanne Aitken ◽  
Linda Reaby ◽  
Richard L. Clancy ◽  
Janet D. Pierce
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

An Evidence-Based Protocol for Manual Prone Positioning of Patients With ARDS

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Patrick Ryan ◽  
Cynthia Fine ◽  
Christine DeForge
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Unplanned Extubations

Background Manual prone positioning has been shown to reduce mortality among patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, but it is associated with a high incidence of pressure injuries and unplanned extubations. This study investigated the feasibility of safely implementing a manual prone positioning protocol that uses a dedicated device. Review of Evidence A search of CINAHL and Medline identified multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that demonstrated both the reduction of mortality when prone positioning is used for more than 12 hours per day in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and the most common complications of this treatment. Implementation An existing safe patient-handling device was modified to enable staff to safely perform manual prone positioning with few complications for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. All staff received training on the protocol and use of the device before implementation. Evaluation This study included 36 consecutive patients who were admitted to the medical intensive care unit at a large academic medical center because of hypoxemic respiratory failure/acute respiratory distress syndrome and received mechanical ventilation and prone positioning. Data were collected on clinical presentation, interventions, and complications. Sustainability Using the robust protocol and the low-cost device, staff can safely perform a low-volume, high-risk maneuver. This method provides cost savings compared with other prone positioning methods. Conclusions Implementing a prone positioning protocol with a dedicated device is feasible, with fewer complications and lower costs than anticipated.

Prone Positioning has no Effect on Mortality in ARDS

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-265
Author(s):  
Alex Puxty ◽  
Chris Cairns ◽  
Malcolm Daniel
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Simplified Acute Physiology Score ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Subsequent Change ◽  
Saps Ii ◽  
Change In Practice

In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), prone positioning improves oxygenation but has no impact on mortality, except perhaps in those with Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II >50. Level of evidence: 1+ (SR based on small RCTs, conducted prior to ARDSNet – subsequent change in practice)

Gas Exchange of prone positioning in influenza pneumonia-related acute respiratory distress syndrome: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Taiwan

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ko-Wei Chang ◽  
Shih-Wei Lin ◽  
Li-Pang Chuang ◽  
Shinn-Jye Liang ◽  
Kuang-Yao Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Influenza Pneumonia ◽  
Paco2 Level

Abstract Background: Prone positioning has demonstrated decreased mortality in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prone positioning in patients with influenza pneumonia-related severe ARDS. Methods: This retrospective study includes eight tertiary referral centers. All the patients with influenza pneumonia induced severe ARDS and receiving prone positioning were enrolled. Demographic data, laboratory data, treatment record, ventilator setting data and outcomes were collected. PaO2 responders were defined as the PaO2/FiO2 ratio increasing by ≥20% or ≥20 mm Hg, while PaCO2 responders were defined as PaCO2 decreasing by ≥1 mm Hg after prone positioning for one day. Results: Sixty-five patients receiving prone positioning were enrolled, with 37 (57%) were PaO2 responders and 33 (51%) were PaCO2 responders. Mortality rates were not significantly different between responders and non-responders. PaCO2 responder survivors had significantly shortened length of stay at the ICU (21.0 ± 13.5 vs. 31.7 ± 18.5 days, P = 0.038) and hospital (30.2 ± 16.6 vs. 43.0 ± 16.3 days, P = 0.013) than did non-responders. Multivariate analysis revealed younger age (odds ratio 0.903, 95% confidence interval 0.824-0.989; P = 0.028) and higher PaCO2 level before prone positioning (odds ratio 1.121 confidence interval 1.020-1.231; P = 0.017) were the predictors of PaCO2 responders. Conclusions: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study of influenza pneumonia patients with severe ARDS receiving prone positioning, PaCO2 responders had modestly better clinical outcomes. Younger age and higher PaCO2 level before prone positioning were the predictors of PaCO2 responders. Keywords: Prone positioning, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Influenza, Gas exchange, Outcome

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document