Prone Positioning to Reduce Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

2015 ◽  
pp. 31-38
Author(s):  
Antonio Pisano ◽  
Luigi Verniero ◽  
Federico Masserini
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Prone Positioning

An Evidence-Based Protocol for Manual Prone Positioning of Patients With ARDS

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Patrick Ryan ◽  
Cynthia Fine ◽  
Christine DeForge
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Unplanned Extubations

Background Manual prone positioning has been shown to reduce mortality among patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, but it is associated with a high incidence of pressure injuries and unplanned extubations. This study investigated the feasibility of safely implementing a manual prone positioning protocol that uses a dedicated device. Review of Evidence A search of CINAHL and Medline identified multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that demonstrated both the reduction of mortality when prone positioning is used for more than 12 hours per day in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and the most common complications of this treatment. Implementation An existing safe patient-handling device was modified to enable staff to safely perform manual prone positioning with few complications for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. All staff received training on the protocol and use of the device before implementation. Evaluation This study included 36 consecutive patients who were admitted to the medical intensive care unit at a large academic medical center because of hypoxemic respiratory failure/acute respiratory distress syndrome and received mechanical ventilation and prone positioning. Data were collected on clinical presentation, interventions, and complications. Sustainability Using the robust protocol and the low-cost device, staff can safely perform a low-volume, high-risk maneuver. This method provides cost savings compared with other prone positioning methods. Conclusions Implementing a prone positioning protocol with a dedicated device is feasible, with fewer complications and lower costs than anticipated.

Prone Positioning has no Effect on Mortality in ARDS

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-265
Author(s):  
Alex Puxty ◽  
Chris Cairns ◽  
Malcolm Daniel
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Simplified Acute Physiology Score ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Subsequent Change ◽  
Saps Ii ◽  
Change In Practice

In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), prone positioning improves oxygenation but has no impact on mortality, except perhaps in those with Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II >50. Level of evidence: 1+ (SR based on small RCTs, conducted prior to ARDSNet – subsequent change in practice)

Gas Exchange of prone positioning in influenza pneumonia-related acute respiratory distress syndrome: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Taiwan

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ko-Wei Chang ◽  
Shih-Wei Lin ◽  
Li-Pang Chuang ◽  
Shinn-Jye Liang ◽  
Kuang-Yao Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Influenza Pneumonia ◽  
Paco2 Level

Abstract Background: Prone positioning has demonstrated decreased mortality in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prone positioning in patients with influenza pneumonia-related severe ARDS. Methods: This retrospective study includes eight tertiary referral centers. All the patients with influenza pneumonia induced severe ARDS and receiving prone positioning were enrolled. Demographic data, laboratory data, treatment record, ventilator setting data and outcomes were collected. PaO2 responders were defined as the PaO2/FiO2 ratio increasing by ≥20% or ≥20 mm Hg, while PaCO2 responders were defined as PaCO2 decreasing by ≥1 mm Hg after prone positioning for one day. Results: Sixty-five patients receiving prone positioning were enrolled, with 37 (57%) were PaO2 responders and 33 (51%) were PaCO2 responders. Mortality rates were not significantly different between responders and non-responders. PaCO2 responder survivors had significantly shortened length of stay at the ICU (21.0 ± 13.5 vs. 31.7 ± 18.5 days, P = 0.038) and hospital (30.2 ± 16.6 vs. 43.0 ± 16.3 days, P = 0.013) than did non-responders. Multivariate analysis revealed younger age (odds ratio 0.903, 95% confidence interval 0.824-0.989; P = 0.028) and higher PaCO2 level before prone positioning (odds ratio 1.121 confidence interval 1.020-1.231; P = 0.017) were the predictors of PaCO2 responders. Conclusions: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study of influenza pneumonia patients with severe ARDS receiving prone positioning, PaCO2 responders had modestly better clinical outcomes. Younger age and higher PaCO2 level before prone positioning were the predictors of PaCO2 responders. Keywords: Prone positioning, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Influenza, Gas exchange, Outcome

Nursing Management of Prone Positioning in Patients With COVID-19

2020 ◽  
pp. e1-e9
Author(s):  
Filippo Binda ◽  
Federica Marelli ◽  
Alessandro Galazzi ◽  
Riccardo Pascuzzo ◽  
Ileana Adamini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Improvement Project

Background At the height of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Italy had the highest number of deaths in Europe; most occurred in the Lombardy region. Up to 4% of patients with COVID-19 required admission to an intensive care unit because they developed a critical illness (eg, acute respiratory distress syndrome). Numerous patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome who had been admitted to the intensive care unit required rescue therapy like prone positioning. Objectives To describe the respiratory management of and the extensive use of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 at the intensive care unit hub in Lombardy, Italy. Methods A total of 89 patients (67% male; median age, 59 years [range, 23-80 years]) with confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted between February 23 and March 31, 2020, were enrolled in this quality improvement project. Results Endotracheal intubation was required in 86 patients (97%). Prone positioning was used as rescue therapy in 43 (48%) patients. Significantly more younger patients (age ≤ 59 years) were discharged alive (43 of 48 [90%]) than were older patients (age ≥ 60 years; 26 of 41 [63%]; P < .005). Among the 43 patients treated with prone ventilation, 15 (35% [95% CI, 21%-51%]) died in the intensive care unit, of which 10 (67%; P < .001) were older patients. Conclusions Prone positioning is one strategy available for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19. During this pandemic, prone positioning can be used extensively as rescue therapy, per a specific protocol, in intensive care units.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document