New reliable and valid motor assessment scale for stroke patients: Hemiplegic motor behavior tests

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izumi Ohtsuru ◽  
Fumio Eto ◽  
Naoki Wada ◽  
Ikuko Saotome ◽  
Teruhito Furuichi
Author(s):  
Sulaiman Mazlan ◽  
◽  
Hisyam Abdul Rahman ◽  
Babul Salam Ksm Kader Ibrahim ◽  
Yeong Che Fai ◽  
...  

The Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) is a predictive model that was commonly used to predict the clinical score of stroke patients. However, the performance of the predictive model slightly depends on the method of feature selection on the data as input predictor to the model. Therefore, appropriate feature selection method needs to be investigated in order to give an optimum performance of the prediction. This paper aims (i) to develop predictive model for Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) prediction of stroke patients, (ii) to establish relationship between kinematic variables and MAS score using a predictive model, (iii) to evaluate the prediction performance of a predictive model based on root mean squared error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination R2. Three types of feature selection methods involve in this study which are the combination of all kinematic variables, the combination of the best four or less kinematic variables, and the combination of kinematic variables based on p < 0.05. The prediction performance of MLR model between two assessment devices (iRest and ReHAD) has been compared. As the result, MLR model for ReHAD with the combination of kinematic variables that has p < 0.05 as input predictor has the best performance with Draw I (RMSEte = 1.9228, R2 = 0.8623), Draw Diamond (RMSEte = 2.6136, R2 = 0.7477), and Draw Circle (RMSEte = 2.1756, R2 = 0.8268). These finding suggest that the relationship between kinematic variables and MAS score of stoke patients is strong, and the MLR model with feature selection of kinematic variables that has p < 0.05 is able to predict the MAS score of stroke patients using the kinematic variables extracted from the assessment device.


1985 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet H. Carr ◽  
Roberta B. Shepherd ◽  
Lena Nordholm ◽  
Denise Lynne

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Lima ◽  
Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela ◽  
Lívia Castro Magalhães ◽  
Glória Elizabeth Laurentino ◽  
Luan César Simões ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 365
Author(s):  
Cecilia Estrada-Barranco ◽  
Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda ◽  
Vanesa Abuín-Porras ◽  
Francisco Molina-Rueda

(1) Background: Observational scales are the most common methodology used to assess postural control and balance in people with stroke. The aim of this paper was to analyse the construct validity of the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) scale in post-stroke patients in the acute, subacute, and chronic stroke phases. (2) Methods: Sixty-one post-stroke participants were enrolled. To analyze the construct validity of the PASS, the following scales were used: the Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC), the Wisconsin Gait Scale (WGS), the Barthel Index (BI) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). (3) Results: The construct validity of the PASS scale in patients with stroke at acute phase was moderate with the FAC (r = −0.791), WGS (r = −0.646) and FIM (r = −0.678) and excellent with the BI (r = 0.801). At subacute stage, the construct validity of the PASS scale was excellent with the FAC (r = 0.897), WGS (r = −0.847), FIM (r = −0.810) and BI (r = −0.888). At 6 and 12 months, the construct validity of the PASS with the FAC, WGS, FIM and BI was also excellent. (4) Conclusions: The PASS scale is a valid instrument to assess balance in post-stroke individuals especially, in the subacute and chronic phases (at 6 and 12 months).


1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
SA Adams ◽  
RM Pickering ◽  
A. Ashburn ◽  
NB Lincoln

physiopraxis ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (11/12) ◽  
pp. 24-27
Author(s):  
Renata Horst

Mit der MAS (Motor Assessment Scale) kann man Behandlungsergebnisse reliabel und valide dokumentieren. Allerdings berücksichtigt sie einige Alltagsaktivitäten nicht, die für manche Patienten bedeutsam sind. Lesen Sie in diesem Beitrag von Renata Horst, wie man die MAS an die Bedürfnisse der Patienten anpasst.


1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet H. Carr ◽  
Roberta B. Shepherd ◽  
Lena Nordholm ◽  
Denise Lynne

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document