Bedeutsames im Blick

physiopraxis ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (11/12) ◽  
pp. 24-27
Author(s):  
Renata Horst

Mit der MAS (Motor Assessment Scale) kann man Behandlungsergebnisse reliabel und valide dokumentieren. Allerdings berücksichtigt sie einige Alltagsaktivitäten nicht, die für manche Patienten bedeutsam sind. Lesen Sie in diesem Beitrag von Renata Horst, wie man die MAS an die Bedürfnisse der Patienten anpasst.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Lima ◽  
Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela ◽  
Lívia Castro Magalhães ◽  
Glória Elizabeth Laurentino ◽  
Luan César Simões ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izumi Ohtsuru ◽  
Fumio Eto ◽  
Naoki Wada ◽  
Ikuko Saotome ◽  
Teruhito Furuichi

1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet H. Carr ◽  
Roberta B. Shepherd ◽  
Lena Nordholm ◽  
Denise Lynne

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saakje P. da Costa ◽  
Nicole Hübl ◽  
Nicole Kaufman ◽  
Arend F. Bos

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 1607-1613
Author(s):  
Birgitta Langhammer ◽  
Louise Ada ◽  
Mari Gunnes ◽  
Hege Ihle-Hansen ◽  
Bent Indredavik ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate whether an 18-month, physical activity coaching program is more effective than standard care in terms of upper-limb activity. Design: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Three municipalities in Norway. Population: A total of 380 persons with stroke. Intervention: The intervention group received follow-up visits and coaching on physical activity and exercise each month for 18 months after inclusion, by a physiotherapist. The control group received standard care. Main measures: The primary outcome, in this secondary analysis, was Motor Assessment Scale items 6, 7, and 8. Secondary outcomes were National Institute of Health Stroke Scale item 5, the Stroke Impact Scale domain 7, and the Modified Ashworth Scale in flexion/extension of the elbow. Results: In total, 380 persons with stroke were recruited, with mean (SD) age 72 (11) years, and baseline scores total National Institute of Health Stroke Scale was 1.4 (2.2)/1.6 (2.4) and Motor Assessment Scale items 6, 7 and 8 in the intervention/control group was 5.5 (1.2)/5.5 (1.2), 5.4 (1.4)/5.4 (1.3), and 3.6 (2)/3.5 (2), respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of upper limb function in any of the Motor Assessment Scale items. In this population with minor stroke, upper-limb activity was good at three months post-stroke (74% of the maximum) and remained good 18 months later (77% of maximum). Conclusion: After intervention, there was no difference between the groups in terms of upper-limb activity.


2009 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebekah L. Pickering ◽  
Isobel J. Hubbard ◽  
Kerry G. Baker ◽  
Mark W. Parsons

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document